2017
DOI: 10.1080/14772000.2017.1313792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence-based species delineation and molecular phylogenetics of the transitional Nearctic–Neotropical grasshopper genusTaeniopoda(Orthoptera, Romaleidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the four MOUTs delineated by GMYC analysis using COI gene ( S10 Table ), they didn't be supported by either morphological or geographical informations. Furthermore, this approach tends to overestimate the number of species because of errors in reconstruction of ultrametric input trees [ 49 , 50 ], or in the presence of high population structure or considerably high values of effective population size [ 51 , 52 ], especially when mitochondrial genomic dataset is employed [ 11 ]. Although GMYC was considered a robust tool for delimiting species when only single-locus information was available [ 53 ], it cannot be used as sufficient evidence for evaluating the specific status of particular cases without additional data [ 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As for the four MOUTs delineated by GMYC analysis using COI gene ( S10 Table ), they didn't be supported by either morphological or geographical informations. Furthermore, this approach tends to overestimate the number of species because of errors in reconstruction of ultrametric input trees [ 49 , 50 ], or in the presence of high population structure or considerably high values of effective population size [ 51 , 52 ], especially when mitochondrial genomic dataset is employed [ 11 ]. Although GMYC was considered a robust tool for delimiting species when only single-locus information was available [ 53 ], it cannot be used as sufficient evidence for evaluating the specific status of particular cases without additional data [ 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species delimitation using molecular data has attracted more and more attention from systematists and taxonomists because of the rapid development of sequencing techniques and bioinformatic methods. There are many successful cases in grasshoppers using molecular evidence for species delimitation so far [ 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 11 14 , 19 21 ]. Molecular approaches for species delimitation can be used not only to confirm delimitations proposed by traditional taxonomy [ 11 ], but also to delimit new species under an integrative taxonomy framework despite the possibility of oversplitting sometimes [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as in other orthopteran taxa (e.g. De Jesús-Bonilla, Barrientos-Lozano, & Zaldívar-Riverón, 2017;Sanabria-Urbán, Song, Oyama, González-Rodríguez, & Cueva Del Castillo, 2017), species delimitation and recognition of supraspecific groups in this subfamily have been considerably problematic. The latter due to the existence of species complexes in an apparent initial state of differentiation, and the recent discovery of several new species and genera for the subfamily (Arce-Pérez & Morón, 2000;Walker, Forrest, & Spooner, 2003;Rocha-Sánchez, Barrientos-Lozano, Zaldívar-Riverón, & Almaguer-Sierra, 2016;Heller et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The use of molecular markers, both nuclear and mitochondrial, have shed light on the phylogenetic relationships of a large number of insect groups at different taxonomic levels, including orthopterans (e.g. Mugleston, Song, & Whiting, 2013;Song, 2015;De Jesús-Bonilla et al, 2017;Kensinger, Schwemm, & Luttberg, 2017;Sanabria-Urbán et al, 2017;Grzywacz, Lehmann, Chobanov, & Lehmann, 2018). In this study we aimed to investigate the phylogenetic relationships among species of the eight representative genera that belong to the Dichopetala group to test both the monophyly of the group as well as of its genera.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%