2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence-dependent cross-resistance of combined radiotherapy plus BRAFV600E inhibition in melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, single symptomatic metastases can be irradiated if systemic treatment controls disease in the rest of the body. In recent years, targeted therapies such as BRAFMEK inhibitor therapy and immune check point inhibitors with anti-CTLA4/PD-1 antibodies have improved the overall survival of patients with metastatic melanoma [48,49] and the combination of radiotherapy with systemic therapies has been thoroughly evaluated [50][51][52][53]. Nevertheless, outcomes are still dissatisfying, and improvement is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, single symptomatic metastases can be irradiated if systemic treatment controls disease in the rest of the body. In recent years, targeted therapies such as BRAFMEK inhibitor therapy and immune check point inhibitors with anti-CTLA4/PD-1 antibodies have improved the overall survival of patients with metastatic melanoma [48,49] and the combination of radiotherapy with systemic therapies has been thoroughly evaluated [50][51][52][53]. Nevertheless, outcomes are still dissatisfying, and improvement is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shannan et al. displayed that KDM5B favored cell survival by transcriptional modulation of genes related to cell cycle, DNA repair and cell death [ 31 ]. Our observations derived from rescue experiments exhibited that silencing of PIK3C3 mitigated the effects of sh-KDM5B on ESCC cell autophagosome formation, cell cycle arrest, and radio-resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following human melanoma cell lines were maintained in 2% FBS-substituted (Tu2% 32 ) or 4% FBS-substituted (Tu4% 33 melanoma medium at 5% CO2: Wistar cell lines 451Lu ( BRAF V 600 E , PTEN wt , NRAS wt ), 451Lu BR ( BRAF V600E , PTEN wt , NRAS wt ), WM164 ( BRAF V600E , PTEN wt , NRAS wt ), WM3734 ( BRAF V600E , PTEN del , NRAS wt ), WM88 ( BRAF V600E , PTEN wt , NRAS wt ), WM9 ( BRAF V600E , PTEN del , NRAS wt ), WM983B ( BRAF V600E , PTEN wt , NRAS wt ), WM983B BR ( BRAF V600E , PTEN wt , NRAS wt ). Details on WM3734 KDM5Bprom-EGFP , lentiviral infected WM3734_sh_KDM5B_62 and WM3734_sh_scramble control cells and WM3734 Tet3G-shJARID1B were previously described 15, 34 . The commercial human melanoma cell lines MelJuSo ( BRAF WT , PTEN WT , NRAS NRASQ61L ), MeWo ( BRAF WT , PTEN WT , NRAS wt ), SKMel5 ( BRAF V600E , PTEN n.d. , NRAS wt ), SKMel28 ( BRAF V600E , PTEN T167A , NRAS wt ) were grown in RPMI medium with 10% FBS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%