2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0573-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence-specific prediction of the efficiencies of adenine and cytosine base editors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
89
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, Cas9-CPs without DNA cleavage activities but retaining DNA binding abilities remained to be discovered and evaluated in the future, as our results suggested that under specific conditions, DNA cleavage activity might be dispensable for SpCas9-DSs-based tools. Additionally, modest positive correlations have been observed between N-terminal-based conventional ABE/CBE activities and DNA cleavage activity of Cas9 24 while ABE-nSpCas9-DS770 to ABE-nSpCas9-DS919 described here maintained high editing activities without any DNA cleavage activity. As regions 770-919 mainly cover the HNH domain in Cas9, it is possible that deaminase inside here might induce specific conformation changes to promote base editing process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Additionally, Cas9-CPs without DNA cleavage activities but retaining DNA binding abilities remained to be discovered and evaluated in the future, as our results suggested that under specific conditions, DNA cleavage activity might be dispensable for SpCas9-DSs-based tools. Additionally, modest positive correlations have been observed between N-terminal-based conventional ABE/CBE activities and DNA cleavage activity of Cas9 24 while ABE-nSpCas9-DS770 to ABE-nSpCas9-DS919 described here maintained high editing activities without any DNA cleavage activity. As regions 770-919 mainly cover the HNH domain in Cas9, it is possible that deaminase inside here might induce specific conformation changes to promote base editing process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Thus, for both base editors, the sequences in their editing windows and the bases surrounding the edited bases were kept unaltered. Neighboring (+/-1) nucleotides can strongly in uence the e ciency of base editing; 'GAC' and 'ACA' employed here for ABE and CBE, respectively, have been shown to be associated with medium level activities for both base editors 46 . Lacking data suggesting the opposite, we have expected that the differences in the 34 target sequences (in the PAM proximal 10 nucleotides) should primarily affect the interactions between the fused SpCas9 nuclease partner of the base editors and the targets, thus this experimental design was speci cally suited to study how the binding and cleavage propensities of SpCas9 variants affect the base editors' activities.…”
Section: On-target Activity Of Base Editors With Increased Delity Spcmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To prepare pLenti-NG-PE2-BSD, the Lenti_Split-BE4-N-Blast plasmid 24 was digested with restriction enzymes AgeI and BamHI (New England Biolabs (hereafter, for brevity, NEB)) and a MEGAquick-spin total fragment DNA purification kit (iNtRON Biotechnology) was used to gel purify the linearized plasmid. Fragments of PE2-encoding sequence (Addgene #132775) and NG-Cas9encoding sequence (Addgene #124163) were amplified by PCR using Phusion Polymerase (NEB).…”
Section: Construction Of Plasmid Vectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%