1996
DOI: 10.1016/0037-0738(95)00058-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence stratigraphy and cyclic development of Basal Zechstein carbonate-evaporite deposits with emphasis on Zechstein 2 off-platform carbonates (Upper Permian, Northeast Germany)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). Two desiccation events, probably coinciding with the three intra-Ca2 cycles as proposed by Piske and Schretzenmayr (1984) and Strohmenger et al (1996) could be identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4). Two desiccation events, probably coinciding with the three intra-Ca2 cycles as proposed by Piske and Schretzenmayr (1984) and Strohmenger et al (1996) could be identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Similarly Strohmenger et al (1996) inferred Ca2-intracyclicity from sequence stratigraphic analyses of coastal Ca2 deposits from NE-Germany. Intra-Ca2-cyclicity is reflected by variation in organic matter composition over the entire A1-Ca2-A2 interval (Schwark et al 1997).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By way of contrast, basin center sequences are falling-stage and lowstand evaporites (laminated gypsum/anhydrite and bedded halite), passing up into transgressive-highstand pelagic, starved-basin, condensed organic-calcareous rhythmites, possibly with highstand calciturbidites derived from adjacent platforms. In recent years, other sequence stratigraphic interpretations have been published for the Zechstein of NW Europe including Strohmenger et al (1996) for Germany, Peryt and Wagner (1998) and Slowakiewicz and Mikolajewski (2009) for Poland. Differences re- late to decisions of where to place the sequence bound…”
Section: Case Study: the Upper Permian Carbonate-evaporite Successionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness ranges between 20 and 80 m for platform and 10 and 250 m for slope deposits, with decreasing thickness from upper to lower slope. The basinal facies is usually thinner than 10 m. The overall trend in thickness and facies distribution is influenced by sea-level variations, tectonic subsidence, syndepositional tectonic, and the geometry of the underlying Werra Anhydrite [42]. Highest thicknesses are achieved within the upper slope, where the Ca2 directly overlies the former A1 slope [35].…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%