2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequencing artifacts derived from a library preparation method using enzymatic fragmentation

Abstract: DNA fragmentation is a fundamental step during library preparation in hybridization capturebased, short-read sequencing. Ultra-sonication has been used thus far to prepare DNA of an appropriate size, but this method is associated with a considerable loss of DNA sample. More recently, studies have employed library preparation methods that rely on enzymatic fragmentation with DNA endonucleases to minimize DNA loss, particularly in nano-quantity samples. Yet, despite their wide use, the effect of enzymatic fragme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In next-generation sequencing (NGS), investigations revealed that sequencing errors can be introduced in the process of DNA isolation, DNA fragmentation and library preparation, which interfered detection of rare variants. [20][21][22][23] In contrast, few studies revealed the sequence errors in sanger sequencing because the low-frequent substitutions were not considered at all, and the instrumentation and chemistry currently used for Sanger sequencing is highly reliable and reproducible. Thus, the unusual and intriguing sequencing artifacts in our study are deserved clear and detailed investigation to prevent the possible misinterpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In next-generation sequencing (NGS), investigations revealed that sequencing errors can be introduced in the process of DNA isolation, DNA fragmentation and library preparation, which interfered detection of rare variants. [20][21][22][23] In contrast, few studies revealed the sequence errors in sanger sequencing because the low-frequent substitutions were not considered at all, and the instrumentation and chemistry currently used for Sanger sequencing is highly reliable and reproducible. Thus, the unusual and intriguing sequencing artifacts in our study are deserved clear and detailed investigation to prevent the possible misinterpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore sequenced BKPyV genomes over the course of our experiment and examined if recombination was occurring during persistent infection. We prepared DNA libraries directly from low-molecular-weight DNA with a transposon-based library preparation kit to minimize recombination artifacts that could be generated during the DNA library preparation ( 20 ). We also started with a maximum amount of the DNA template to minimize the number of PCR cycles required to barcode the library, such that we were able to prepare all libraries with only five PCR cycles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with short-read sequencing, Nanopore long-read sequencing technologies make it possible to detect and identify viruses faster as well as accurately characterize the genomic complexity with complete coverage of the entire genome by a single read ( 6 ). In addition, as a fundamental step during library preparation in short-read sequencing, DNA fragmentation could introduce sequencing bias due to the randomness, incorporation errors, or artifactual indels caused by enzymatic effects ( 7 ), and these fragmentation biases can be lowered using Nanopore sequencing technology. Here, we report that using Nanopore sequencing technology and long reads, a nearly complete genome sequence was successfully obtained from a human norovirus GII.1[Pg] strain associated with a case of acute gastroenteritis in the United States in 2016.…”
Section: Announcementmentioning
confidence: 99%