2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2515-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential 18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of complete pathological response in breast and axilla during neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Abstract: In triple-negative tumours a PET/CT scan after 6 weeks (three cycles) appears to be optimally predictive of pCR. In HER2-positive tumours neither a PET/CT scan after 3 weeks nor after 8 weeks seems to be useful. The changes in SUVmax of both the tumour and axillary nodes combined correlates best with pCR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
50
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies have evaluated the predictive value of FDG-PET in TNBC treated with NAC. Most of these found a good predictive value of PET in this subtype, after both 1 and 2 cycles of NAC (24,33,34). In the study of Groheux and colleagues, a cutoff of À50% of DSUV max offered the best accuracy in predicting pCR, whereas a À42% cutoff was optimal to predict relapse (24).…”
Section: Biologic Biomarkers Of Tumor Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Few studies have evaluated the predictive value of FDG-PET in TNBC treated with NAC. Most of these found a good predictive value of PET in this subtype, after both 1 and 2 cycles of NAC (24,33,34). In the study of Groheux and colleagues, a cutoff of À50% of DSUV max offered the best accuracy in predicting pCR, whereas a À42% cutoff was optimal to predict relapse (24).…”
Section: Biologic Biomarkers Of Tumor Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As most studies that have previously assessed PET-based tumor response in breast cancer (24,34), and in accordance with the recommendations of the European Organization of Research and Treatment of cancer (EORTC; ref. 35), the relative change in tumor SUV max was measured to assess tumor response.…”
Section: Biologic Biomarkers Of Tumor Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective of our study was to determine whether PET is useful in predicting pCR and patient outcome early in TNBC patients and to evaluate whether the type of chemotherapy regimen influences metabolic response. The secondary objectives were to optimize the PET criteria for predicting pathologic response and to determine whether assessing 18 F-FDG changes in axillary nodes, in addition to the primary tumor, improves PET prediction as recently suggested (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports have described early treatment response assessment using FDG-PET in specific subtypes of breast cancer, including ER-positive tumors [79,83,85,86], HER2-positive tumors [82,84,85,87], and triple-negative tumors [85,88]. However, there are several problems in such studies.…”
Section: Early Treatment Response Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many studies [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90] that have evaluated a possible role for metabolic evaluation with FDG-PET and PET/ CT, investigators demonstrated a correlation between early changes in FDG uptake, mostly in terms of the SUV max value, after one or two courses of chemotherapy and the final pathologic response upon completion of chemotherapy, or patient outcome (Table 4). A review article including 745 patients in 15 studies indicated that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for early separation of responders from non-responders could reach 80.5 % (95 % CI, 75.9-84.5 %) and 78.8 % (95 % CI, 74.1-83.0 %), respectively [91].…”
Section: Early Treatment Response Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%