2016 American Control Conference (ACC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2016.7526061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential Action Control for models of underactuated underwater vehicles in a planar ideal fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the (experimentally determined) effective mass and moment of inertia of the rigid body are given by M = normaldiag ( 6 . 04 , 17 . 31 , 8 . 39 ) g and J = normaldiag ( 1 . 57 , 27 . 78 , 54 . 11 ) g cm 2 , respectively. This example is inspired by work in Mamakoukas et al (2016) and Postlethwaite et al (2009) and the parameters used for the effective mass and moment of inertia of a rigid body correspond to measurements of a fish. The control inputs are F 2 = T 3 = 0 and F 3 0 .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where the (experimentally determined) effective mass and moment of inertia of the rigid body are given by M = normaldiag ( 6 . 04 , 17 . 31 , 8 . 39 ) g and J = normaldiag ( 1 . 57 , 27 . 78 , 54 . 11 ) g cm 2 , respectively. This example is inspired by work in Mamakoukas et al (2016) and Postlethwaite et al (2009) and the parameters used for the effective mass and moment of inertia of a rigid body correspond to measurements of a fish. The control inputs are F 2 = T 3 = 0 and F 3 0 .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where normalΛ h T ρ ρ T h and α d normalℝ expresses the desired value of the mode insertion gradient term (see, for example, Mamakoukas et al, 2016). Typically, α d = γ J o , where J o is the cost function (3) computed using default dynamics f 1 .…”
Section: Control Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of this observation, our previous work in [3]- [7] presented Sequential Action Control (SAC), a receding horizon approach for control of nonlinear systems, that exploits elements from hybrid systems theory [8], [9]. In contrast with the aforementioned MPC methods, the openloop solution in SAC optimizes the needle variation [10] of the cost resulting in a single, constant magnitude action which does not optimize, but rather improves the cost function value relative to applying only a nominal control signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…where the effective mass and moment of inertia of the rigid body are given by M = diag(6.04, 17.31, 8.39) g and J = diag(1.57, 27.78, 54.11)g·cm 2 , respectively. This example is inspired by work in [45], [50] and the parameters used for the effective mass and moment of inertia of a rigid body correspond to measurements of a fish. The control inputs are F 2 = T 3 = 0 and F 3 ≥ 0.…”
Section: Underactuated Dynamic 3d Fishmentioning
confidence: 99%