1997
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/13.2.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential and parallel algorithms for DNA sequencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another source of difficulty exists when the spectrum contains repeated fragments. Most existing algorithms that allow for errors in the input spectrum put restrictions on the error model [5][10] [11]. There are few algorithms that do not have any restriction on the input error model.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another source of difficulty exists when the spectrum contains repeated fragments. Most existing algorithms that allow for errors in the input spectrum put restrictions on the error model [5][10] [11]. There are few algorithms that do not have any restriction on the input error model.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be done by combinatorial algorithms. There have been many successful solutions already presented in the literature (Lysov et al 1988;Dramanac et al 1989;Pevzner 1989;Bui and Youssef 2004;Blazewicz and Kasprzak 2003;Blazewicz et al 1997Blazewicz et al , 2002Blazewicz et al , 2004Blazewicz et al , 2006a. This paper presents a unique insight into the DNA sequencing by hybridization problem from the perspective of developing generic search techniques which could be applied to different combinatorial optimization problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of reconstructing the sequence is NP-hard when there are hybridization errors [11]. However, several heuristics were proposed [4][5][6][7][8][9]13,15]. Halperin et al [12] gave an algorithm with provable performance in the following model: each k-tuple contained in the target appears in the (experimental) spectrum with probability 1 − q, and each k-tuple that is not contained in the target appears in the spectrum with probability p. In other words, the false negative probability is q, and the false positive probability is p. Furthermore, the appearance of a tuple is independent of the other k-tuples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%