1974
DOI: 10.1037/h0020077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential effects in discrete-trials instrumental escape conditioning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

1975
1975
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the present study dealt with aversive conditioning, some might be hesitant to accept the theoretical explanations given for our results. However, the aforementioned theoretical processes thought to regulate persistence in reward conditioning have recently been shown to operate in escape conditioning (e.g., Mellgren, Nation & Wrather, 1975;Seybert, Mellgren, Jobe, & Eckert, 1974). It seems, therefore, that our results indeed do fall within theoretical boundary conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Since the present study dealt with aversive conditioning, some might be hesitant to accept the theoretical explanations given for our results. However, the aforementioned theoretical processes thought to regulate persistence in reward conditioning have recently been shown to operate in escape conditioning (e.g., Mellgren, Nation & Wrather, 1975;Seybert, Mellgren, Jobe, & Eckert, 1974). It seems, therefore, that our results indeed do fall within theoretical boundary conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Thus, the present results are consistent with Amsel's (1958) nonsequential theory of extinction performance and differ from the outcome predicted by the sequential effects hypothesis (Capaldi, 1964(Capaldi, , 1967. The results of the present experiment also differ from those reported by Seybert, Mellgren, Jobe, and Eckert (1974). In their smalltrial shock-escape experiments, it was found that the number of N-R transitions and N-length, both st.".Jential variables, affected resistance to extinction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Retrieving the memory of 20 pellets on Trial 3 of the 20-0-20 series apparently resulted in that memory's elevating speed on Trial 2 of that series. 351 Rats remember hedonic events such as reinforcement and nonreinforcement, and these memories can exercise considerable control over responding in a wide variety of instrumental learning tasks (e.g., Capaldi, 1966;Capaldi, Verry, & Davidson, 1980;Grosslight & Radlow, 19S6;Haggbloom, 1980;Haggbloom & Tillman, 1980;Seybert, Mellgren, Jobe, & Eckert, 1974).Understanding this behavioral control, however, depends upon how many hedonic events are remembered in particular situations: the animal may remember only the immediately prior hedonic event (single-event hedonic memory) or two or more prior hedonic events (multiple-event hedonic memory). The single-event hypothesis has proved capable of explaining a widevariety of instrumental learning effects (see, e.g., Capaldi, Nawrocki, & Verry, 1982;Capaldi et a1., 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%