2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serial measurements of f/VT can predict extubation failure in patients with f/VT ≤ 105?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to training load, we monitored the patients' heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure throughout the study. In contrast to the results of a previous study, 13 we found a significant increase in heart rate only when systolic and diastolic blood pressure were not significantly different before and after training. A previous study also found that mobilization (ie, sitting on the edge of the bed, sitting to standing, a standing transfer from the edge of the bed to a chair or walking) significantly increased heart rate and blood pressure and caused a nonsignificant S pO 2 decrease in acutely ill patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With regard to training load, we monitored the patients' heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressure throughout the study. In contrast to the results of a previous study, 13 we found a significant increase in heart rate only when systolic and diastolic blood pressure were not significantly different before and after training. A previous study also found that mobilization (ie, sitting on the edge of the bed, sitting to standing, a standing transfer from the edge of the bed to a chair or walking) significantly increased heart rate and blood pressure and caused a nonsignificant S pO 2 decrease in acutely ill patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…13 A sample size of 16 patients was therefore required in each group to demonstrate a f/V T difference of 20 with a statistical power of 80% and a 2-sided ␣ level of Ͻ .05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tanios et al (24) demonstrated that including f/ V T in a protocol prolonged weaning time (2.0 vs. 3.0 days; p = 0.04); in addition, that weaning predictor neither conferred survival benefit nor reduced the incidence of extubation failure. (25) A multicenter randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation compared the usual care for weaning with computer-driven weaning, and the investigators found a reduction in weaning time (5 days vs. 3 days; p = 0.01) and in the total duration of MV (12.0 days vs. 7.5 days; p = 0.003); however, the reintubation rates did not differ (23% vs. 16%; p = 0.4). (26) Kollef et al (27) argued that protocol-guided weaning from MV is safe and leads to extubation more rapidly than does physician-directed weaning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study 7 , several predictive indexes were evaluated, and the RSBI showed greater sensitivity and specificity in identifying the patients who progressed toward successful extubation. Later studies conducted to evaluate the predictive power of the RSBI to identify the outcome of weaning and extubation found differences that were primarily related to the population studied and the technique used for measurement [8][9][10] . Currently, in some institutions, the decision to submit the patient to an SBT or extubation is often influenced by or based solely on the value of RSBI, which is usually measured once a day 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%