Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults

Fraiman, Joseph; Erviti, Juan; Jones, Mark; Greenland, Sander; Whelan, Patrick; Kaplan, Robert M.; Doshi, Peter

doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.036

Cited by 149 publications

(175 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

170

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There have also been a number of reports casting doubt on the validity of the results of these trials (e.g. [12], [13]). The duration of any protection given by the vaccines, and their activity against variants, is also in doubt.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simulation and inference on purely observational methods of monitoring vaccine effectiveness post-deployment: none is reliable without precise information on population behaviour

Sewell¹

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simulation and inference on purely observational methods of monitoring vaccine effectiveness post-deployment: none is reliable without precise information on population behaviour

Sewell¹

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As far as I am aware, only three peer-reviewed journal articles involving microscopic analysis of the COVID-19 "vaccine" contents exist, two of them published in this journal (Jeon, 2022;Lee et al 2022;Giovannini et al 2022). This is despite abundant evidence of serious injury and death caused by those "vaccines" (Seneff & Nigh, 2021;Broudy, 2021, p. 102;Blaylock, 2022;Oller & Santiago 2022;Fraiman et al 2022;Exposé, 2022a). One source, from February 2022, compiles over 1,000 peer-reviewed articles on the harms arising from the "vaccines".…”

Section: Microscopic Analysis Of Covid-19 "Vaccines": a Word On Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

What Is in the So-called COVID-19 “Vaccines”? Part 1: Evidence of a Global Crime Against Humanity

Hughes¹

2022

Vaccine Theory Prac & Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Between July 2021 and August 2022, evidence of undisclosed ingredients in the COVID-19 “vaccines” was published by at least 26 researchers/research teams in 16 different countries across five continents using spectroscopic and microscopic analysis. Despite operating largely independently of one another, their findings are remarkably similar and highlight the clear and present danger that the world’s population has been lied to regarding the contents of the COVID-19 “vaccines”. This raises grave questions about the true purpose of the dangerous experimental injections that have so far been shot into 5.33 billion people (over two thirds of the human race), including children, apparently without their informed consent regarding the contents. Surprise findings include sharp-edged geometric structures, fibrous or tube-like structures, crystalline formations, “microbubbles”, and possible self-assembling nanotechnology. The blood of people who have received one or more COVID-19 “vaccines” appears, in case after case, to contain foreign bodies and to be seriously degraded, with red blood cells typically in Rouleaux formation. Taken together, these 26 studies make a powerful case for the full force of scientific investigation to be brought to bear on the COVID-19 “vaccine” contents. If the findings of these 26 studies are confirmed, then the political implications are nothing short of revolutionary: a global crime against humanity has been committed, in which every government, every regulator, every establishment media organization, and all the professions have been complicit.

show abstract

“…From observational data it is possible to calculate the number who would need to be vaccinated to prevent a COVID-19 death. For example, comparing the population death rates 16 during the Delta wave gives 230 for people over 80s needing to be vaccinated to prevent a single death in that period with that number rising to 520 for people in their 70s and 10 000 for people in their 40s (see Table 2 and Figure 1 17 ). However, these figures will be distorted by inaccuracies in the measure of the size of the unvaccinated population.…”

Section: Questioning the Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Accessing data from the FDA and health Canada websites and combining results from journal articles that published the Pfizer and Moderna trials, the authors concluded that the absolute risk of a serious adverse event from the mRNA vaccines (a rate of one in 800) significantly exceeded the risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation in randomised controlled trials. 17 …”

Section: What Are the Harms?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 1

Malhotra

2022

JMH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: In response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), several new pharmaceutical agents have been administered to billions of people worldwide, including the young and healthy at little risk from the virus. Considerable leeway has been afforded in terms of the pre-clinical and clinical testing of these agents, despite an entirely novel mechanism of action and concerning biodistribution characteristics.Aim: To gain a better understanding of the true benefits and potential harms of the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) coronavirus disease (COVID) vaccines.Methods: A narrative review of the evidence from randomised trials and real world data of the COVID mRNA products with special emphasis on BionTech/Pfizer vaccine.Results: In the non-elderly population the “number needed to treat” to prevent a single death runs into the thousands. Re-analysis of randomised controlled trials using the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology suggests a greater risk of serious adverse events from the vaccines than being hospitalised from COVID-19. Pharmacovigilance systems and real-world safety data, coupled with plausible mechanisms of harm, are deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety. Mirroring a potential signal from the Pfizer Phase 3 trial, a significant rise in cardiac arrest calls to ambulances in England was seen in 2021, with similar data emerging from Israel in the 16–39-year-old age group.Conclusion: It cannot be said that the consent to receive these agents was fully informed, as is required ethically and legally. A pause and reappraisal of global vaccination policies for COVID-19 is long overdue.Contribution: This article highlights the importance of addressing metabolic health to reduce chronic disease and that insulin resistance is also a major risk factor for poor outcomes from COVID-19.

show abstract

Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults

Cited by 149 publications

References 28 publications

Simulation and inference on purely observational methods of monitoring vaccine effectiveness post-deployment: none is reliable without precise information on population behaviour

Simulation and inference on purely observational methods of monitoring vaccine effectiveness post-deployment: none is reliable without precise information on population behaviour

What Is in the So-called COVID-19 “Vaccines”? Part 1: Evidence of a Global Crime Against Humanity

Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 1

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About