2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sero-epidemiological study of peste des petits ruminants (PPR) in sheep and goats under different production systems in South Omo, southern Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, the similar, higher, and lower seroprevalence of PPRV antibodies in this study were reported in the neighbouring countries of Bangladesh, for example, in India, 44.7 % by Hota et al (2018) , and 2.98 % by Krishna et al (2001) ; and in Pakistan, 51.34 % by Khan et al (2007) , 53 % by Abubakar et al (2009) , and 37.2 % by Nizamani et al (2015) . Globally, similar seroprevalence was recorded, for example, 46.68 % by Gari et al (2017) in Ethiopia and 46.7 % by Almeshay et al (2017) in Libya; still higher seroprevalence was reported by Saeed et al (2018) as 68.1 % and lower was reported by Mebrahtu et al (2018) (16.2 %). The disparity in seroprevalence rates could be attributed to a variety of factors, including immunity levels such as vaccination status or previous PPR exposure, differences in sheep farming systems across regions, allocation of sheep populations, animal trading, nutritional components, genetic makeup, animal trading, farmers' socioeconomic status, and diagnostic procedures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Previously, the similar, higher, and lower seroprevalence of PPRV antibodies in this study were reported in the neighbouring countries of Bangladesh, for example, in India, 44.7 % by Hota et al (2018) , and 2.98 % by Krishna et al (2001) ; and in Pakistan, 51.34 % by Khan et al (2007) , 53 % by Abubakar et al (2009) , and 37.2 % by Nizamani et al (2015) . Globally, similar seroprevalence was recorded, for example, 46.68 % by Gari et al (2017) in Ethiopia and 46.7 % by Almeshay et al (2017) in Libya; still higher seroprevalence was reported by Saeed et al (2018) as 68.1 % and lower was reported by Mebrahtu et al (2018) (16.2 %). The disparity in seroprevalence rates could be attributed to a variety of factors, including immunity levels such as vaccination status or previous PPR exposure, differences in sheep farming systems across regions, allocation of sheep populations, animal trading, nutritional components, genetic makeup, animal trading, farmers' socioeconomic status, and diagnostic procedures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…And the high demand of male animals for meat purpose driven them to the market and contribute to the higher infection rate than female which kept at home for breeding purpose and also due to genetic variation of the animals [38]. In contrast many other authors reports higher prevalence in female than male [10,22,25,26,27,34,39,40,41,42,43]. This could be due to breeding females being used for flock reproduction maintenance for a more extended period than males and higher density of females than males in flocks, or physiological differences between females and males…”
Section: Publication Bias Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%