2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00580-018-2697-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sero-epidemiological study of peste des petits ruminants in small ruminants in Amahara region, Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
9
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated pooled sero-prevalence indicated that PPR is varies significantly between species and higher in sheep 33.56% than goats 25.14%. This report is similar with other several studies [21, 22, 23, 24, and 25] and disagreed with reports that indicated PPR is more prevalent in goat than sheep [10,26,27]. Although there are biological differences between sheep and goats, higher sero-prevalence in one species than another could be due to factors such as sampling process, richness or distribution of animal in a geographical area, management practices and strain of the virus.…”
Section: Publication Bias Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimated pooled sero-prevalence indicated that PPR is varies significantly between species and higher in sheep 33.56% than goats 25.14%. This report is similar with other several studies [21, 22, 23, 24, and 25] and disagreed with reports that indicated PPR is more prevalent in goat than sheep [10,26,27]. Although there are biological differences between sheep and goats, higher sero-prevalence in one species than another could be due to factors such as sampling process, richness or distribution of animal in a geographical area, management practices and strain of the virus.…”
Section: Publication Bias Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…And the high demand of male animals for meat purpose driven them to the market and contribute to the higher infection rate than female which kept at home for breeding purpose and also due to genetic variation of the animals [38]. In contrast many other authors reports higher prevalence in female than male [10,22,25,26,27,34,39,40,41,42,43]. This could be due to breeding females being used for flock reproduction maintenance for a more extended period than males and higher density of females than males in flocks, or physiological differences between females and males…”
Section: Publication Bias Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast with what has been reported in the literature where lowland pastoral nomadic practices have been associated with higher PPR seroprevalence due to large number of animals in continuous movement in search of fodder and water, whereas animal mixing is less frequent in the highlands with small sedentary herds (14, 20). However, more recently, Fentie et al (21) reported that small ruminants reared in the lowland and highland areas were more affected than those reared in midland (25, 14.58 vs. 7.5% respectively, P < 0.05). The difference between the present results and literature may be due to different sampling procedures in the different studies that affect their representativeness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The field data from our study did not allow a detailed evaluation of the role of the herd size, species composition of the herds and the production system (sedentary highland and lowland pastoral nomadic) on the seroprevalence rates in the two regions which may also explain the difference between results of our study and the literature. Seasonality of the disease also might have affected the results as the time period of the study was limited and outbreaks are more frequent during the main rainy season which typically lasts from March to October in Ethiopia (21). Thus, presence of active PPR outbreaks at the time of serum sample collection in one or both zones studied also could have affected our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such findings are consistent with other research that reported an equal prevalence of PPR in sheep and goats (Balamurugan, Saravanan, et al, 2012). Several individual studies reported that PPR is more prevalent in sheep than goats (Abubakar et al., 2009; El‐Yuguda et al., 2010; Enan et al., 2013) or more prevalent in goats than sheep (Delil et al., 2012; Farougou et al., 2013; Fentie et al., 2018). Although there are biological differences between sheep and goats, higher prevalence in one species than another could be due to factors such as sampling process, richness or distribution of animal in a geographical area, management practices and strain of the virus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%