2018
DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0276-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological and molecular detection of Leptospira spp in dogs

Abstract: Introduction: This study aimed to detect anti-Leptospira spp antibodies and Leptospira DNA in domestic dogs. Methods: Blood and urine from 106 dogs were evaluated by microscopic agglutination test (MAT) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), respectively. Results: Six (5.7%) and one (1%) animals were positive by MAT and PCR, respectively. Conclusions: These results show a low prevalence of infection by Leptospira spp. The absence of positive results for the Icterohaemorrhagiae serogroup indicates the small relev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…39 In contrast, lower molecular detection rates of 19.8% (26 of 131; 95% CI: 13.0–26.7%) and 1.0% (1 of 106; 95% CI: 0.0–2.8%) have been reported in 2 other studies. 28,49 Although these latter 2 studies were of a similar size to our study, the target populations were apparently healthy dogs, which could explain the lower detection rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…39 In contrast, lower molecular detection rates of 19.8% (26 of 131; 95% CI: 13.0–26.7%) and 1.0% (1 of 106; 95% CI: 0.0–2.8%) have been reported in 2 other studies. 28,49 Although these latter 2 studies were of a similar size to our study, the target populations were apparently healthy dogs, which could explain the lower detection rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…In addition, "dog ownership" was identified as a potential risk factor for humans [17][18][19][20][21][22]. Worldwide studies showed a prevalence of urinary shedding of Leptospira in dogs between 0.2 and 31.1% by PCR [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Shedding can also occur in healthy dogs [23, 25, 31-33, 35, 37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings were consistent with a previous study reported at 42.4% (14/33; 95%CI: 25.6–59.3%) [ 33 ], despite having a smaller sample size, but with a similar target population. In contrast, Latosinski et al (2018) [ 34 ] and Santanna et al (2017) [ 35 ] reported lower molecular detection rates, at 19.8% (26/131; 95%CI: 13.0–26.7%) and 1.0% (1/106; 95%CI: 0.0–2.8%), respectively. Although both studies had a large sample size, the recruitment of apparently healthy dogs could explain the lower detection rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%