1981
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.1890070105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological diagnosis of acute tick‐borne encephalitis by demonstration of antibodies of the IgM class

Abstract: A sensitive enzyme immunoassay is described for demonstrating specific antibodies of the IgM class to tick-borne encephalitis virus (anti-TBEV IgM). Anti-mu-coated, flat-bottomed microtiter plates are incubated with diluted patients' serum (2 hr at 37 degrees C), then with purified TBEV, and later with peroxidase-coupled anti-TBEV immunoglobulin for a further 2 hr. After washing the plates, orthophenylenediamine is added and the optical density is measured at 510 nm. At an early stage after onset of illness an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TBEV infections were confirmed by demonstration of TBEV-specific IgM and IgG antibodies in serum by routine serological screening tests (IMMUNOZYM FSME IgG, IgM, IMMUNO AG, Heidelberg, Germany) [16]. Specimens were tested at the Department of Virology in the Institute of Medical Microbiology of the University of Freiburg.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TBEV infections were confirmed by demonstration of TBEV-specific IgM and IgG antibodies in serum by routine serological screening tests (IMMUNOZYM FSME IgG, IgM, IMMUNO AG, Heidelberg, Germany) [16]. Specimens were tested at the Department of Virology in the Institute of Medical Microbiology of the University of Freiburg.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important, given that viral serological testing based solely on the determination of the presence of IgM can lead to false conclusions, because IgM responses last for only a very short period of time and could be missed if serum samples are collected too early or too late [14]. On the other hand, IgM can persist for months or even years after primary infection and reappear during secondary infection [15]. When interpreting our IgM results, one should be aware that the IgM assay used in the present study was based on the indirect enzyme immunoassay format, the sensitivity of which might be inferior to that of the IgM capture format, and that our omission of the IgG antibody removal step might have decreased the assay's sensitivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, detection of IgM can be missed if the serum sample is taken too late or too early and can thus cause false exclusions of current infections. There are also many reports on IgM responses that persisted for months or even years after the primary infection [Thomas et al, 1992;Erdman et al, 1991;Roggendorf et al, 1981;Hofmann et al, 1983 a;Zaaijer et al, 1993;Lundkvist et al, 1993]. This situation may result in a false-positive diagnosis of current infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific tests for diagnosis or exclusion of current TBEV infection are therefore required for differential diagnosis and for the determination of immunity. IgG and IgM-specific ELISAs have been used successfully in recent years Roggendorf et al, 1981;Frisch-Niggemeyer, 1982;Hofmann and Popow-Kraupp 1982;Hofmann et al, 1983a,b;Grandien et al, 1984;Schmitz and Emmerich, 1984;Hofmannn et al, 1985;Grubhoffer et al, 1988]. Evaluation of TBE virus specific IgM ELISAs pointed to the problem of persistent TBE virus IgM [Roggendorff et al, 1981;Hofmann et al, 1983a], which might lead to false-positive determinations of current viral infection in some cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%