2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serological prevalence and risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii in Zoo Mammals in Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the seroprevalence obtained in this study was comparable to the seroprevalence of T. gondii from zoo mammals in other countries, including 33% of 1043 animals in the Czech Republic (Bártová et al, 2018), 35% of 117 animals in China (Zhang et al, 2000), and 38.8% of 227 animals in the United States (de Camps et al, 2008). Furthermore, the seroprevalence of T. gondii in this study was lower than that in Brazil (Marujo et al, 2017), Spain (Cano‐Terriza et al, 2020), or Mexico (Alvarado‐Esquivel et al, 2013), ranging from 40.5% to 53.3%, but higher than that in a Chilean zoo, reported 22.2%, using the same commercial ELISA kit (Muñoz et al, 2021). A lower T. gondii seroprevalence was also found in domestic dogs (15.5%), stray dogs (11.4%–39.1%) (Fan et al, 1998; Lin et al, 2004; Tsai et al, 2008), domestic cats (14%), stray cats (37%) (Lin et al, 1998), pigs (10.1%–28.8%) (Fan et al, 2004; Tsai et al, 2007), pigeons (4.7%) (Tsai et al, 2006), and humans (9.3%) (Chiang et al, 2012) in Taiwan, suggesting that certain captive conditions might be favourable for the circulation of T. gondii .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Moreover, the seroprevalence obtained in this study was comparable to the seroprevalence of T. gondii from zoo mammals in other countries, including 33% of 1043 animals in the Czech Republic (Bártová et al, 2018), 35% of 117 animals in China (Zhang et al, 2000), and 38.8% of 227 animals in the United States (de Camps et al, 2008). Furthermore, the seroprevalence of T. gondii in this study was lower than that in Brazil (Marujo et al, 2017), Spain (Cano‐Terriza et al, 2020), or Mexico (Alvarado‐Esquivel et al, 2013), ranging from 40.5% to 53.3%, but higher than that in a Chilean zoo, reported 22.2%, using the same commercial ELISA kit (Muñoz et al, 2021). A lower T. gondii seroprevalence was also found in domestic dogs (15.5%), stray dogs (11.4%–39.1%) (Fan et al, 1998; Lin et al, 2004; Tsai et al, 2008), domestic cats (14%), stray cats (37%) (Lin et al, 1998), pigs (10.1%–28.8%) (Fan et al, 2004; Tsai et al, 2007), pigeons (4.7%) (Tsai et al, 2006), and humans (9.3%) (Chiang et al, 2012) in Taiwan, suggesting that certain captive conditions might be favourable for the circulation of T. gondii .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Exposure to this protozoan had previously been described in captive populations of cervids from other countries in the region [81] and in other wild species in Chile [36], but not in native cervids. The seroprevalence in under-human-care pudus was lower than that reported (38.3%) for other captive cervid species in Chile [45]. Although there are some reports of reproductive pathologies caused by T. gondii in deer species [135,136], reports of fatal cases of toxoplasmosis in cervids are not common in zoos or hatcheries [137,138].…”
Section: Toxoplasma Gondiimentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Statistical differences in positivity to each studied pathogen were estimated. The analysis was performed by calculating seroprevalence differences and 95% confidence intervals for the differences (when possible), based on a chi-square approach and testing that positivity rate differences were equal to 0 [44,45]. Statistically significant differences were set at p-value < 0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%