1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9063(199605)47:1<81::aid-ps388>3.0.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serologically Based Diagnostic and Quantification Tests for Nematodes

Abstract: Plant parasitic nematodes are important plant pests which are difficult to identify and quantify. Serologically based techniques offer new ways to identify and quantify these parasites. Several factors need to be considered when developing an immunoassay for plant parasitic nematodes, including the application of the assay and the extraction procedure which together determine the likely organisms with which antibodies may cross-react. The four major factors: taxon specificity, nematode stage specificity, antib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antibodies, both polyclonal and monoclonal, have been produced for Meloidogyne spp. diagnostics, but the use of antibodies is limited to a few examples as it has, according to Blok & Powers (2009), been superseded by DNA-based diagnostics (Davies et al, 1996;Tastet et al, 2001). In recent years, identification methods that are DNA-based have gained popularity and this has led to a combination of both morphological, biochemical and molecular methods to describe and identify nematodes (Karssen et al, 2004;Castillo et al, 2009).…”
Section: Species Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibodies, both polyclonal and monoclonal, have been produced for Meloidogyne spp. diagnostics, but the use of antibodies is limited to a few examples as it has, according to Blok & Powers (2009), been superseded by DNA-based diagnostics (Davies et al, 1996;Tastet et al, 2001). In recent years, identification methods that are DNA-based have gained popularity and this has led to a combination of both morphological, biochemical and molecular methods to describe and identify nematodes (Karssen et al, 2004;Castillo et al, 2009).…”
Section: Species Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only partial discrimination between adult females of the nematode species could be made. Davies et al (1996) and Lima et al (2005) raised monoclonal antibodies against M.incognita with an aim to identify the species, but they cross reacted with some other species of root knot nematodes. Hence, in the present studies, an attempt has been made to develop ELISA for specific identification of M.incognita.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G. rostochiensis and G. pallida can be distinguished by morphological features of the cysts but this requires a high degree of skill and is time consuming. A method based on iso‐electric focusing (IEF) of proteins extracted from cysts (Fleming and Marks, 1982) has been used as a diagnostic test, as have immunological methods (Davies et al ., 1996). More recently, PCR‐based test methods have become the method of choice for species identification (Mulholland et al ., 1996; Bulman and Marshall, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%