2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13337-020-00574-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seroprevalence of peste des petits ruminants in sheep and goats in Eastern India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On screening of the 776 serum samples, the observed apparent and calculated true seroprevalence was 1.16% and -0.005 %, respectively (Table 1) et al, 2017;Acharya et al, 2018;Dayhum et al, 2018;Burns et al, 2019) including some studies from India with varying levels of seroprevalence (Singh et al, 2004a;Raghavendra et al, 2008;Balamurugan et al, 2014a;2020a;Devi et al, 2016). The present study defines the prevalence of SRMV antibodies in small ruminants in Sikkim and generated evidence of a very low apparent seroprevalence, which might be due to the collected random samples were from apparently healthy animals and not from PPR suspected animals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On screening of the 776 serum samples, the observed apparent and calculated true seroprevalence was 1.16% and -0.005 %, respectively (Table 1) et al, 2017;Acharya et al, 2018;Dayhum et al, 2018;Burns et al, 2019) including some studies from India with varying levels of seroprevalence (Singh et al, 2004a;Raghavendra et al, 2008;Balamurugan et al, 2014a;2020a;Devi et al, 2016). The present study defines the prevalence of SRMV antibodies in small ruminants in Sikkim and generated evidence of a very low apparent seroprevalence, which might be due to the collected random samples were from apparently healthy animals and not from PPR suspected animals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nevertheless, the majority of the reports from India represent only the regional isolated data using a limited number of samples (Singh et al, 2004a;Raghavendra et al, 2008;Balamurugan et al, 2011;2014a; 2020 a; b; De et al, 2016;Devi et al, 2016). Furthermore, neither systematic post-vaccination monitoring nor any sero-surveillance or monitoring plan was undertaken except a few organized studies, that represents a zone or state/UT 2020b;c). The results from different studies in India demonstrated the widespread nature of the disease except for the Andaman Nicobar archipelago (Singh et al, 2004a;Raghavendra et al, 2008;Balamurugan et al, 2011Balamurugan et al, , 20122014a,c, 2016; 2020 a; b; c).…”
Section: Advances In Animal and Veterinary Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The observed low seroprevalence of PPR in these (UK, HP, and J&K) states might be because the samples were randomly collected from apparently healthy animals and not from PPR suspected animals. Furthermore, the regional difference in the prevalence of the PPRV antibodies based on the relative population has also been reported [ 4 , 11 ]. In general, the low seroprevalence of PPR in sheep and goats in an ecological and geographically niche of hilly terrains could be because the topology of the region per se restricts migration of animals from the nearby region, low population density, availability of low grazing area, and thus close contact of animals are avoided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%