1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1992.tb01143.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seroprevalence Survey for Anaplasma marginale‐Infection of Austrian Cattle

Abstract: Summary A serologic survey study of 5,076 Austrian cattle farming herds was carried out in the period of December 1988 till March 1990. One animal was randomly selected from each herd and the antibody titer against Anaplasma marginale in blood serum samples was evaluated by means of the complement fixation test. The number of these tested blood samples was 3.6% of 140,081 cattle herd farms of Austria. 109 (2.1 %) of the tested animals showed positive titers (1: 10) against Anaplasma marginale, in relation to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The origin of the pathogens is not yet clear. In countries with warmer climates, such as Italy south of the Alps, all of the vector-borne pathogens mentioned are common (5,9,11), and mixed infections with several of these infectious agents have also been described in other parts of the world (25,32). It is well documented that climatic changes influence species distributions (35,53), and it had been speculated that with the global warming trend (31) species such as ticks can follow the warmer climate (6,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin of the pathogens is not yet clear. In countries with warmer climates, such as Italy south of the Alps, all of the vector-borne pathogens mentioned are common (5,9,11), and mixed infections with several of these infectious agents have also been described in other parts of the world (25,32). It is well documented that climatic changes influence species distributions (35,53), and it had been speculated that with the global warming trend (31) species such as ticks can follow the warmer climate (6,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Europe the geographical distribution of ovine anaplasmosis is restricted to the southern countries, including France (Cuille and Chelle, 1936), Italy (de la Fuente et al, 2005), Turkey (Sayin et al, 1997), Greece (Papadopoulos, 1999), Bulgaria (Christova et al, 2003) and Southeast Romania (Ardeleanu et al, 2003). Similarly, A. marginale is endemic mainly to the Mediterranean-Balkanian countries: France (Poncet et al, 1987), Spain and Portugal (de la Fuente et al, 2004;Caeiro, 1999), Italy (de la Fuente et al, 2005), but it has also been reported in the northern latitude of the Alpean region (Baumgartner et al, 1992;Dreher et al, 2005a). In Hungary only sporadic occurrence of bovine anaplasmosis was recognized in an imported herd of cattle (Dankó et al, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. marginale infection in cattle and wild ruminants was reported in several parts of Europe, including the Mediterranean countries of Spain and Portugal [ 6 , 7 ], Italy [ 4 , 5 ], and occasionally in France [ 23 ], the Alpine region of Switzerland [ 8 , 17 ] and more recently in Hungary [ 10 ]. However, the epidemiology of anaplasmosis in Europe has not been thoroughly investigated and local vector species were not identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anaplasmosis is endemic in tropical and sub-tropical regions where the disease constitutes a constraint to the cattle production. In Europe anaplasmosis is endemic in several Mediterranean countries including Italy [ 4 , 5 ], Portugal [ 6 ] and Spain [ 7 ], and has occasionally been reported in Austria [ 8 ], Switzerland [ 9 ] and Hungary [ 10 ]. Mechanical transmission of A. marginale is effected by blood-contaminated fomites, including hypodermic needles, castration instruments, ear tagging devices, tattooing instruments, and dehorning saws or by blood-contaminated mouthparts of biting flies [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%