2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0893-133x(01)00240-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serotonin-Dopamine Interactions in the Control of Conditioned Reinforcement and Motor Behavior

Abstract: These studies addressed the question of serotonin (5-HT)-dopamine (DA) interactions with regard to reward-related behavior and motor activity in rats. The first experiment evaluated the effect of chronic treatment with fluoxetine (7 mg/kg/day), a serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitor, and buproprion (15 mg/kg/day), a dopamine reuptake inhibitor, on responding for conditioned reinforcement (CR). Chronic fluoxetine, but not buproprion, enhanced CR responding, and also potentiated cocaine-induced increases in CR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(96 reference statements)
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter finding suggests that serotonin affects the way that reward-associated signals influence behaviour; consistent with reports that fluoxetine potentiates the control of ongoing responding by available conditioned reinforcers (Sasaki-Adams and Kelley, 2001;Fletcher et al, 1999). In this context, it is important to note that the results of the present study do not, in themselves, show that tryptophan depletion reduces sensitivity to reward per se rather the data indicate that the TÀ volunteers did not discriminate as effectively as the T+ volunteers between differences in the magnitude of rewards associated with different choices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter finding suggests that serotonin affects the way that reward-associated signals influence behaviour; consistent with reports that fluoxetine potentiates the control of ongoing responding by available conditioned reinforcers (Sasaki-Adams and Kelley, 2001;Fletcher et al, 1999). In this context, it is important to note that the results of the present study do not, in themselves, show that tryptophan depletion reduces sensitivity to reward per se rather the data indicate that the TÀ volunteers did not discriminate as effectively as the T+ volunteers between differences in the magnitude of rewards associated with different choices.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Evidence of a role for serotonin in reward processing includes recent demonstrations that the behavioural and reinforcing effects of cocaine in rats are potentiated by treatment with selective serotonin-reuptake blockers (SSRIs) (Cunningham and Callahan, 1991;Kleven and Koek, 1998;Sasaki-Adams and Kelley, 2001), and that brain self-stimulation thresholds can be dose-dependently altered with SSRI treatment (Harrison and Markou, 2001a, b). Also relevant are serotonin's acknowledged involvement in clinical depression (eg Schildkraut, 1965) and the more general observation that SSRI treatment is relatively effective in the treatment of clinical depressive illness, while the temporary reduction of central serotonin function in vulnerable individuals through rapid dietary tryptophan depletion has been shown to reinstate depressive symptoms and flat affect (Moore et al, 2000;Smith et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serotonin (5-HT) has been extensively implicated in depressed mood and is well known to affect the motivational properties of stimuli predictive of rewards (Fletcher et al, 1999;Sasaki-Adams and Kelley, 2001;Deakin, 1983;Wilkinson et al, 1995;Graeff et al, 1986), probably through interaction with the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system (Robbins et al, 1989;Robbins and Everitt, 2002). Treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) dose dependently decreases brain self-stimulation thresholds (Harrison and Markou, 2001), while the reinforcing effects of cocaine, cocaine-associated stimuli, and other stimuli predictive of rewards are potentiated by SSRI treatment and, conversely, attenuated by central 5-HT depletion (Aronson et al, 1995;Sasaki-Adams and Kelley, 2001;Redgrave and Horrell, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) dose dependently decreases brain self-stimulation thresholds (Harrison and Markou, 2001), while the reinforcing effects of cocaine, cocaine-associated stimuli, and other stimuli predictive of rewards are potentiated by SSRI treatment and, conversely, attenuated by central 5-HT depletion (Aronson et al, 1995;Sasaki-Adams and Kelley, 2001;Redgrave and Horrell, 1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumbal 5-HT levels were increased in all treatments relative to undisturbed controls. These rapid increases in NAc 5-HT levels following brief social threat or environmental disturbance may either facilitate NAc DA-mediated motivational behaviors [47,48], or enhance survival by reducing expression of inappropriate behavior in aversive contexts [49,50].…”
Section: Effects Of Social Threat On Limbic Monoaminesmentioning
confidence: 99%