Serpulidae (Annelida) of Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia

Kupriyanova, Elena K.; Sun, Yanan; Hove, H.A. ten; Wong, Eunice; Rouse, Greg W.

doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4019.1.13

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Evaluation: Gender-variable adjective with ending feminine as in Sun et al (2015: 85) and Kupriyanova et al (2015; 293), both mistakenly reporting the original name as ‘ trivesiculosa ’). Usages as ‘ trivesiculosus ’ (besides original) exist (e.g., ten Hove and Ben Eliahu 2005: 134).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Hydroides Gunnerus, 1768 (Annelida, Serpulidae) is feminine: a nomenclatural checklist of updated names

Read¹,

Hove²,

Sun³

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As a service to taxonomists and ecologists using names in the well-known and species-rich ship-fouling serpulid genus Hydroides we present an update of all 107 non-synonymised scientific names, with additional information on Hydroides nomenclature, original names, etymologies, and type localities derived from original literature, and in accord with the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) database. An update is needed because the gender of genus Hydroides has from 1 January 2000 reverted to the original feminine, due to a change in the wording of International Code of Zoological Nomenclature which was overlooked at that time, and is contrary to the usage in practice of Hydroides as masculine which had started about 1992, although Code-required from the 1960s. We match 31 further original names of current WoRMS subjective junior synonyms to each non-synonymised name, and also report on the world distribution of the genus as illustrated by type localities of the valid names. We include notes on seven species inquirenda. The correct rendering is given of six names that have been altered for gender agreement for the first time herein. Hydroides gottfriedi nom. n. replaces junior homonym H. rostrata Pillai, 1971. Currently there are 41 non-synonymised species-group names in Hydroides which should be gender invariant, and 23 names which would only change if moved to a neuter genus; the remaining 43 names are fully gender variable. Place-names (23), and personal names (16) make up more than a third (36%) of the species names, with most of the remainder (68) being descriptive of species character states, usually of operculum morphology (54). All species, except H. norvegica (63°N), have type localities in shallow-water coastal locations in temperate to tropical waters below latitude 44°, with the highest number of new species (54) Geoffrey B. Read et al. / ZooKeys 642: 1-52 (2017) 2

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The conflict was first reported in WoRMS by one of us (GBR) in July 2015, after a misinterpretation of the Code requirement for Hydroides names was published in Tovar-Hernández et al (2016, as first online July 2015, p.8). Gender-corrected names were subsequently used in Sun et al (2015), Kupriyanova et al (2015), and Sun et al (2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hydroides Gunnerus, 1768 (Annelida, Serpulidae) is feminine: a nomenclatural checklist of updated names

Read¹,

Hove²,

Sun³

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the Mediterranean only reported from Greece (Bogdanos and Nicolaidou 1985, Bogdanos and Satsmadjis 1987). Commonly distributed in the Indo-Pacific region (Kupriyanova et al 2015). …”

Section: Checklistsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Polychaetes of Greece: an updated and annotated checklist

Faulwetter

Simboura

Katsiaras

et al. 2017

BDJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe last annotated checklist of marine polychaetes in Greece was published in 2001. Since then, global taxonomic progress, combined with many new species records for Greece, required a thorough review of the taxonomic, nomenclatural and biogeographic status of the national species list. This checklist revises the status of all extant polychaete species reported from the Greek Exclusive Economic Zone since 1832. The work was undertaken as part of the efforts on compiling a national species inventory (Greek Taxon Information System initiative) in the framework of the LifeWatchGreece Research Infrastructure.New informationThis checklist comprises an updated and annotated inventory of polychaete species in Greek waters, compiled from literature reports, online databases, museum collections and unpublished datasets. The list provides information on 836 species-level taxa from Greece, of which 142 are considered questionable. An additional 84 species reported in the past are currently considered absent from Greece; reasons for the exclusion of each species are given. Fourteen species are reported here for the first time from Greek waters. At least 52 species in the present list constitute in fact a complex of cryptic or pseudo-cryptic species. Forty-seven species are considered non-native to the area. In addition to the species-level taxa reported in this checklist, eleven genera have been recorded from Greece with no representatives identified to species level. One replacement name is introduced. For each species, a comprehensive bibliographic list of occurrence records in Greece and the synonyms used in these publications are provided as supplementary material. Where necessary, the taxonomic, nomenclatural or biogeographic status is discussed. Finally, the findings are discussed in the wider context of Mediterranean polychaete biogeography, taxonomic practice and worldwide research progress.

show abstract

“…These sedentary animals are common on shallow coral reefs, where they usually live in close association with scleractinian and milleporid corals (Dai and Yang 1995). In most studies concerning the taxonomy and phylogeny of Spirobranchus worms, little or no attention is given to their host's identity (e.g., Kupriyanova et al 2015;Willette et al 2015). Therefore, it is not unexpected that new host species can still be discovered (Hoeksema and Ten Hove 2014).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%