2012
DOI: 10.3233/cbm-2012-0229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum biomarker profiles as diagnostic tools in lung cancer

Abstract: Background Computed tomography (CT) scanning has emerged as an effective means of early detection for lung cancer. Despite marked improvement over earlier methodologies, the low level of specificity demonstrated by CT scanning has limited its clinical implementation as a screening tool. A minimally-invasive biomarker-based test that could further characterize CT-positive patients based on risk of malignancy would greatly enhance its clinical efficacy. Methods We performed an analysis of 81 serum proteins in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our group previously reported on the use of serum biomarkers as screening tools for NSCLC in a similarly designed study (41), and a comparison of this and the current studies provides several noteworthy observations. MIF was an essential component of the top biomarker panels in the previous serum study, however although it was found to be significantly altered, it was not included in the top performing panels in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our group previously reported on the use of serum biomarkers as screening tools for NSCLC in a similarly designed study (41), and a comparison of this and the current studies provides several noteworthy observations. MIF was an essential component of the top biomarker panels in the previous serum study, however although it was found to be significantly altered, it was not included in the top performing panels in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The performance of this panel also exceeds that of our recently reported serum biomarker panel consisting of MIF, prolactin and thrombospondin which provided a SN/SP of 74/90 in a study of 164 NSCLC patients and healthy controls (41). The evaluation of candidate biomarker panels in early stage cancer patients is likely the most critical aspect in panel development, given the potential to produce a stage shift among cancer diagnoses and improvements in survival trends.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Elevation of serum prolactin, on the other hand, had also been observed in other malignancies and explored for their potential as diagnostic biomarkers, such as in lung and ovarian cancers [47][51]. However, although shown to be potentially useful as a member of multi-marker diagnostic panels, none of these studies could establish prolactin as an independent cancer marker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of these proteins not only provides information in understanding the mechanisms that can account for lung cancer development, but also in providing biomarkers to monitor disease progression [16]. Most of the potential markers described in the literature are derived from end-stage tumors and thus, no biomarkers have achieved sufficient diagnostic significance to reach clinical applications for early diagnosis of lung cancer with an impact on mortality [11,17,18].…”
Section: Significance Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%