2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum Creatinine Predicts Success in Retrograde Ureteral Stent Placement in Patients with Pelvic Malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2007, three retrospective studies were reviewed with various numbers of patients[ 21 - 23 ]. However, five retrospective studies were found in 2008 and 2009[ 24 - 28 ], and three of them had comparative designs[ 25 , 27 , 28 ]. In 2010, the first prospective study was published within the time frame of this review[ 29 ].…”
Section: Description Of Summarized Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2007, three retrospective studies were reviewed with various numbers of patients[ 21 - 23 ]. However, five retrospective studies were found in 2008 and 2009[ 24 - 28 ], and three of them had comparative designs[ 25 , 27 , 28 ]. In 2010, the first prospective study was published within the time frame of this review[ 29 ].…”
Section: Description Of Summarized Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have identified several factors of stent failure in patients with MUO, including the pre-stenting serum creatinine (S-Cr) level, performance states (PS), and degree of hydronephrosis [ 12 , 13 ]. We can reduce the number of unnecessary procedures by carefully considering these risk factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, the reason why stenting was not insisted upon was that renal function was relatively good. However, previous reports on the relationship between stent placement and renal function suggest that stent failure may occur at 4–5 mg of creatinine [ 10 , 11 ]. The renal function in our case was not in a state of immediate stenting, and radiation therapy was not likely to reduce renal function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%