1989
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800761205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum enzymes and other laboratory tests in acute pancreatitis

Abstract: This review evaluates selective enzymes and blood tests available for the diagnosis and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. It is concluded that serum amylase and lipase measurements represent the best available diagnostic methods. Newer alternative assays still require careful evaluation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
58
2
4

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
1
58
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these extrapancreatic elevations may on occasion be very high, many authors have suggested that a cut-off level of three times the ULN be used, thereby increasing the specificity of the enzymes for AP. [1,3,11] These data show that, in line with other published data, [5][6][7] lipase and amylase are both very specific laboratory tests for the diagnosis of AP when the suggested cut-off level is used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although these extrapancreatic elevations may on occasion be very high, many authors have suggested that a cut-off level of three times the ULN be used, thereby increasing the specificity of the enzymes for AP. [1,3,11] These data show that, in line with other published data, [5][6][7] lipase and amylase are both very specific laboratory tests for the diagnosis of AP when the suggested cut-off level is used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It is well known that other intra-abdominal disorders, such as peptic ulcer perforation, mesenteric ischaemia and intestinal obstruction, may present with raised serum lipase/amylase values. [3,5,6,11] These elevations are usually mild (typically between one and two times the ULN). Although these extrapancreatic elevations may on occasion be very high, many authors have suggested that a cut-off level of three times the ULN be used, thereby increasing the specificity of the enzymes for AP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, these new markers have limited clinical availability, but there is significant interest in better understanding markers of immune response and pancreatic injury because these could be valuable tools for reliably predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis and supplementing imaging modalities. [10], [11], [12] …”
Section: Biochemical Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the utility of these enzyme markers is complicated by significant limitations, including low sensitivity and specificity (Young 1989). In aggregate, there are many causes of elevated serum amylase levels, and amylase levels may only be moderately elevated or even normal in proven cases of acute pancreatitis of all degrees of severity (Clavien et al 1989).…”
Section: Serum Amylase and Lipasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While an amylase level of three times the upper limit of normal is often recommended to support a clinical diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, the magnitude of the observed hyperamylasemia has limited direct correlation with disease severity (Clavien et al 1989). Furthermore, after reaching a peak serum concentration, the subsequent return of amylase levels to previously normal levels does not necessarily correlate with resolution of clinical illness, limiting the value of serial measurements (Young 1989).…”
Section: Serum Amylase and Lipasementioning
confidence: 99%