2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum uric acid and impaired cognitive function in community-dwelling elderly in Beijing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data for this article were obtained from the Beijing Longitudinal Study of Aging II study, which was initiated in 2009 10. A multistage cluster random sampling method was performed to select a representative community cohort.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data for this article were obtained from the Beijing Longitudinal Study of Aging II study, which was initiated in 2009 10. A multistage cluster random sampling method was performed to select a representative community cohort.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several studies have reported results in contrast to our current study. Some cross-sectional studies have suggested that higher uric acid levels are a protective factor for cognitive impairment in the elderly [19,50,51]. Moreover, serum UA levels have been found to be low in subjects with established AD or vascular cognitive impairment [52,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, evidence has consistently shown that the level of serum UA is associated with cognitive function, but this relationship remains controversial. Some studies have indicated that the higher level of serum UA is associated with better cognitive performance owing to the antioxidant property of serum UA [18][19][20][21][22][23]. Specifically, a retrospective study including 1374 elderly showed that higher levels of serum UA were related to better cognitive function after controlling for cardiovascular risk factors [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MMSE scale has a sensitivity above 88.3% and a specificity of 87% with a cut-off point of 24 for detecting cognitive impairment in patients with neurodegeneration [20,21]. In this study, cognitive impairment was defined as: a score ≤17 for illiterates; a score ≤20 for primary school graduates (≥6 years of education); and a score ≤24 for junior school graduates or above (≥9 years of education) [22,23].…”
Section: Viewpoints Research Themementioning
confidence: 99%