Proceedings 2000 Kyoto International Conference on Digital Libraries: Research and Practice
DOI: 10.1109/dlrp.2000.942183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Server-side automatic metadata generation using qualified Dublin Core and RDF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, conference papers dominate the list, accounting for more than 60% of all publications selected. This is unsurprising, given that conference papers represent researchers' most recent accomplishments and indicate emerging research trends and the immediacy of personalized peer feedback [68]. As represented by journal articles, peer-reviewed literature is second on the list.…”
Section: Analysis Of Descriptive Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen, conference papers dominate the list, accounting for more than 60% of all publications selected. This is unsurprising, given that conference papers represent researchers' most recent accomplishments and indicate emerging research trends and the immediacy of personalized peer feedback [68]. As represented by journal articles, peer-reviewed literature is second on the list.…”
Section: Analysis Of Descriptive Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach uses a content presentation application to retrieve only the intellectual content of the document, creating a plain text data source upon which rules based on natural language are executed [36,37,38,39,40,41]. Such algorithms commonly include collection of unique words and comparisons of the document vocabulary against reference ontology for generating keywords, descriptions and subject classification.…”
Section: The Ieee Lom and Scorm Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%