2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77332-2_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Service Adoption Spreading in Online Social Networks

Abstract: The collective behaviour of people adopting an innovation, product or online service is commonly interpreted as a spreading phenomenon throughout the fabric of society. This process is arguably driven by social influence, social learning and by external effects like media. Observations of such processes date back to the seminal studies by Rogers and Bass, and their mathematical modelling has taken two directions: One paradigm, called simple contagion, identifies adoption spreading with an epidemic process. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(157 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the standard SIS model does not capture the basic dynamics of social influence and reinforcement, nor the non-linear nature of technological learning/adoption processes 21,22 . This has been confirmed by relatively recent investigations on adoption patterns in online social networks [23][24][25][26][27] . Therefore, complex contagion 28,29 has been proposed as an alternative description in which, for example, threshold mechanisms are introduced in order to account for the effects of peer pressure and social reinforcement mechanisms 30 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This is because the standard SIS model does not capture the basic dynamics of social influence and reinforcement, nor the non-linear nature of technological learning/adoption processes 21,22 . This has been confirmed by relatively recent investigations on adoption patterns in online social networks [23][24][25][26][27] . Therefore, complex contagion 28,29 has been proposed as an alternative description in which, for example, threshold mechanisms are introduced in order to account for the effects of peer pressure and social reinforcement mechanisms 30 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Our observations here have important implications for the study of models with kinetic constraints. Threshold models are widely employed models of complex contagion in the social sciences [29,10,50,35], and the AME framework that we have introduced here lends itself to the analysis of the traditional binary-state threshold models [70] as well of more complex multistate threshold models that are the focus of much current attention [49,40].…”
Section: Kinetically Constrained Dynamics and The Necessity Of High Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We indeed take into consideration both the existence of environmental and personal factors of influence on an individual's behavior. Several studies in information diffusion and influence maximization have reported evidences that, apart from influence coming from social contacts, an individual may be affected by some external event(s) and/or personal reasons to adopt an information (Goyal et al 2010) as well as to delay the adoption of an information (Iniguez et al 2018). In our setting, we tend to reject as true in general, the principle "I agree with my friends' idea and disagree with my foes' idea" (which is also close to the adage "the enemy of my enemy is my friend"), since this would imply that the behavior of a user should be completely determined by the stimuli coming from her/his neighbors.…”
Section: Both Variants ϑ(• •) Range Within the Intervalmentioning
confidence: 99%