2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10922-020-09553-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Service Selection Using Multi-criteria Decision Making: A Comprehensive Overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study explained that Multiple-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) solutions could be applied to ranking predictions and service selections due to their frequent reliance on numerous QoS factors. Resultantly, numerous management and operation science decision models can be applied to the discovery of trusted services [45]. Another study described that, before presenting a comprehensive best-service decision, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) relied on a survey form to allow various experts to assign weights to QoS criteria for services.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study explained that Multiple-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) solutions could be applied to ranking predictions and service selections due to their frequent reliance on numerous QoS factors. Resultantly, numerous management and operation science decision models can be applied to the discovery of trusted services [45]. Another study described that, before presenting a comprehensive best-service decision, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) relied on a survey form to allow various experts to assign weights to QoS criteria for services.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like web service selection [47,48], MCDM methods are also popularly used for cloud service selection [49][50][51]. Youssef [52] used a combination of TOPSIS and BWM to rank cloud service providers based on nine service evaluation criteria, including sustainability, response time, usability, interoperability, cost, maintainability, reliability, scalability, and security.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, SoSwirly aims to optimize only distance and number of services, but at a much larger scale. Similarly, a study by Hosseinzadeh et al [12] provides an overview of various multi-objective optimization algorithms in service networks, but in the context of selecting optimal services rather than deploying them in optimal locations. Stévant, Pazat and Blanc [13] propose a framework which monitors and optimizes service placement to minimize QoS requirements, represented by response time in their evaluation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%