2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Servitizing climate science—Institutional analysis of climate services discourse and its implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This requires a paradigm shift among forecasters and researchers, which appears to be slowly finding its way through the organization. For example, the notion 'science for service' has been taken up, indeed explicitly reflecting a shift towards the servitization (Harjanne, 2017) of MET Norway's research and operational activities. Similarly, one interviewee stated that interactions with users are approached with the idea that ' … the user is always right.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This requires a paradigm shift among forecasters and researchers, which appears to be slowly finding its way through the organization. For example, the notion 'science for service' has been taken up, indeed explicitly reflecting a shift towards the servitization (Harjanne, 2017) of MET Norway's research and operational activities. Similarly, one interviewee stated that interactions with users are approached with the idea that ' … the user is always right.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This recognition goes hand-in-hand with the increasing 'servitization' (Harjanne, 2017) of meteorology from a science that mostly produces and broadcasts data, to a service that informs and advises societal actors. Knowing how users incorporate weather and sea-ice information in their activities should thus be considered throughout the information value chain (Figure 1) (Dawson et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is acknowledged that different users have different needs, in practice-even when a sectoral approach is applied-the diverse CCAP are not adequately differentiated, and the various types of users within a sector are not further distinguished (Swart et al 2017). The fundamental problems on the user side are frequently considered to be a lack of climate literacy, interest, or skills to utilize the available information (Christel et al 2018;Harjanne 2017;WMO 2014). Since perception, motivation, trust, and/or preferences may vary substantially-depending on whether the user is a climate impacts researcher, consultant engineer, business manager, or policy maker-more empirical studies are needed that systematically evaluate the extent to which climate services really meet the needs of the targeted users, and how social, cognitive, and behavioral processes influence the use of climate services in decision-making.…”
Section: B Scrutinizing the Use Of Climate Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, research has focused on producers (Kjellström et al 2016;Harjanne 2017;Räsänen et al 2017) and users of climate services (Cavelier et al 2017;Golding et al 2017a,b;Porter and Dessai 2017;Bruno Soares et al 2018). An undifferentiated discourse about ''the producer'' and ''the user'' is problematic: while a large amount of research acknowledges that different users have different needs, too often the research does not distinguish between different categories of users (Swart et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation