Setting a National Agenda for Surgical Disparities Research

Abstract

Health care disparities (differential access, care, and outcomes owing to factors such as race/ethnicity) are widely established. Compared with other groups, African American individuals have an increased mortality risk across multiple surgical procedures. Gender, sexual orientation, age, and geographic disparities are also well documented. Further research is needed to mitigate these inequities. To do so, the American College of Surgeons and the National Institutes of Health-National Institute of Minority Health and Disparities convened a research summit to develop a national surgical disparities research agenda and funding priorities. Sixty leading researchers and clinicians gathered in May 2015 for a 2-day summit. First, literature on surgical disparities was presented within 5 themes: (1) clinician, (2) patient, (3) systemic/access, (4) clinical quality, and (5) postoperative care and rehabilitation-related factors. These themes were identified via an exhaustive preconference literature review and guided the summit and its interactive consensus-building exercises. After individual thematic presentations, attendees contributed research priorities for each theme. Suggestions were collated, refined, and prioritized during the latter half of the summit. Breakout sessions yielded 3 to 5 top research priorities by theme. Overall priorities, regardless of theme, included improving patient-clinician communication, fostering engagement and community outreach by using technology, improving care at facilities with a higher proportion of minority patients, evaluating the longer-term effect of acute intervention and rehabilitation support, and improving patient centeredness by identifying expectations for recovery. The National Institutes of Health and American College of Surgeons Summit on Surgical Disparities Research succeeded in identifying a comprehensive research agenda. Future research and funding priorities should prioritize patients' care perspectives, workforce diversification and training, and systematic evaluation of health technologies to reduce surgical disparities.

Survival outcomes after prolonged intensive care unit length of stay among trauma patients: The evidence for never giving up

“…Further prospective studies designed to present a direct one-to-one comparison of both adult and older adult trauma versus comparable subgroups of medical/operative patients are warranted to elaborate on the nuances of this result as well as to consider possible variations in longerterm and functional outcomes among trauma patients, for whom such considerations remain poorly explored. [26][27][28] As demonstrated in the work of Laupland et al 12 and Trottier et al, 13 trauma ICU patients are unique. They are reported to comprise only a small …”

Did Pre-Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion Increase Access to Surgical Cancer Care?

“…The NIH and American College of Surgeons have jointly prioritized access to care and insurance status as critical research areas to reduce surgical disparities. 10 We hypothesize that pre-ACA Medicaid expansion increased use and improved access to surgical care. In this regard, we will quantify the impact of New York’s pre-ACA Medicaid expansion on various measures of use and access to surgical cancer care to its beneficiaries overall.…”

Do Estimates of Treatment Risk Based on Clinical Vignettes Differ by Physician Gender?

“…Physicians’ concordance, cultural competency, and relationships with minority patients are common topics in publications on health care disparities [13]. This has sparked a strong interest in research and education addressing these issues [12]. …”