2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0024-3841(99)00044-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting parametric limits on dialectal variation in Spanish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
74
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…is indicative of a movement in Spanish from flexible to rigid word order (Morales 1989;Toribio 2000). We find high rates of subject expression (51%) and a strong preference for SV word order (47%) over VS (4%) in all sentence types, inline with assertions of fixed SVO word order.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…is indicative of a movement in Spanish from flexible to rigid word order (Morales 1989;Toribio 2000). We find high rates of subject expression (51%) and a strong preference for SV word order (47%) over VS (4%) in all sentence types, inline with assertions of fixed SVO word order.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The half-way nature of these grammars has gained them the label of "partial pro-drop systems". Some studies have tried to account for the variation attested in these dialects by postulating that speakers of these varieties are somehow bilingual in their own language, thus they would be able to switch between +NSP and -NSP configurations within a single grammar (Toribio 2000), while others prefer to see the phenomena found in these dialects as the result of a change in progress, where NSL systems would be in the process of turning into NNSLs (Camacho 2008(Camacho , 2013. Toribio (2000: 315-316) begins her well-known study on DS pro-drop phenomena by making a statement that is somehow symptomatic of the long-lasting academic clash between syntacticians and sociolinguists:…”
Section: A Look At Two "Partial Pro-drop Systems" In Romancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For related discussion see Bickerton (1971) and Henry (1995), where syntactic variation has been argued to result from multiple grammars or multiple parametric settings being available to the speakers, respectively. See Toribio (2000) for related discussion concerning the analysis of preverbal subjects in Dominican Spanish. See also Labov (1972), a.o., for the view that probabilities are built into the definition of grammatical rules.…”
Section: A Remaining Issue: the Feature Person Of The Pronominal Remnantmentioning
confidence: 99%