Setting Strategies outside a Typical Environmental Perspective Using ISO 14001 Certification

Abstract

The scope of this research is to evaluate whether ISO 14001 certification could be used as a strategic vehicle for achieving objectives that are not strictly linked to a technical and operative perspective, and to determine what these objectives are. In order to find these objectives, a review of the literature was first conducted to determine what they were and seven hypotheses emerged. The hypotheses concerned the possibility of using ISO 14001 as a strategy for achieving objectives related to finance and turnover, customer satisfaction, community satisfaction, employee satisfaction, health and safety in the workplace, and growth and skills of employees. The validity of each hypothesis was tested via a survey of 164 managers of European manufacturing companies. This research produced interesting findings, some of which contradicted the findings of other research, in particular for financial and turnover objectives. In addition, the research revealed interesting relationships between employees' skills and issues such as Design for the Environment and Sustainability. Furthermore, some limitations of ISO 14001 with respect to the Eco‐Management and Audit Scheme regulation emerged. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

Signaling good by doing good: How does environmental corporate social responsibility affect international expansion?

“…In addition, firms can improve environmental management and performance after being certified (Zobel, 2013). Empirical studies have shown a positive connection between certification and positive environmental outcomes (Chiarini, 2017;King et al, 2005;Qi et al, 2013), which means that certification might convey information about environmental improvement to external stakeholders, such as suppliers and regulators.…”

ISO 14001, EMAS and environmental performance: A meta‐analysis

“…In the last two decades, the dissemination of voluntary environmental certifiable reference standards to implement environmental management systems (EMSs) has gained momentum. These standards specify sets of internal organizational environmental practices and a system for third‐party audits to certify the commitment to the standard's requirements, but no performance levels (Boiral, ; Chiarini, ; Delmas, ; Iatridis & Kesidou, ; King, Lenox, & Terlaak, ). The ISO 14001 voluntary environmental certifiable standard is the main reference model (Boiral, Heras‐Saizarbitoria, & Testa, ; Daddi, Testa, Frey, & Iraldo, ) and has been adopted by more than 360,000 organizations worldwide (ISO, ).…”

Communicating environmental management certification: Signaling without signals?

“…Voluntary certifiable standards for corporate environmental management formalize, systematize, and legitimize a very diverse set of managerial activities and are being adopted by an increasing number of organizations across the world (Boiral, Guillaumie, Heras‐Saizarbitoria, & Tayo Tene, ; Boiral, Heras‐Saizarbitoria, & Testa, ; Demirel, Iatridis, & Kesidou, ; Iatridis & Kesidou, ), despite a certain level of saturation and decline in the dissemination of these standards has been also evidenced (e.g., Chiarini, ; Daddi, De Giacomo, Frey, & Iraldo, ). Among these standards, the environmental certifiable management system standards, also referred to as meta‐standards, are the most prominent (Baek, ; Chiarini, ; Heras‐Saizarbitoria & Boiral, ; Qi, Zeng, Li, & Tam, ). These certifiable standards, such as ISO 14001 and the Eco‐Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS), are based on traditional principles of management, such as the plan–do–check–act (PDCA) cycle of continual improvement, and have similar external certification processes.…”