1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01895315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting test limits under prescribed consumer loss

Abstract: Specification limits, yield, bivariate normal distribution,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of guardbands represents the methods to tackle the inaccuracy of a measurement system by tightening the acceptance limits in order to secure product quality seen by customers, while attempting to minimise the quality costs. There are numerous studies on guardbands and how to specify them optimally [1][2][3][4][5]. These studies, however, examine guardbands from the viewpoint of quality assurance, where the special emphasis is not on minimising the quality costs.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concept of guardbands represents the methods to tackle the inaccuracy of a measurement system by tightening the acceptance limits in order to secure product quality seen by customers, while attempting to minimise the quality costs. There are numerous studies on guardbands and how to specify them optimally [1][2][3][4][5]. These studies, however, examine guardbands from the viewpoint of quality assurance, where the special emphasis is not on minimising the quality costs.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specification limits describe requirements for products, while acceptance limits are the actual decisive factors in manufacturing. Conventional approach has been tightening the acceptance limits, in order to assure quality [1][2][3][4]. This study analyses whether it is worthwhile from the business perspective to consider the opposite, and widen the acceptance limits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without aiming at completeness, we briefly indicate two possible variations. Suppose, we now have (Xn, Y,) i = 1 ..... m and )(2, i = 1 ..... n, where m>~n. Hence, replications are available for a subsample only (see Albers et al, 1994b for a related scheme). Denote Xil by Xi.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%