1999
DOI: 10.1080/00029157.1999.10404214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting the Record Straight (Again)

Abstract: Spiegel's (1998b) further misrepresentations of both social psychological theory and my own social cognitive theory of hypnosis are corrected. There are more points of agreement than differences between Spiegel's position and mine. We agree that (1) role enactment is not a complete explanation of hypnosis or of anything else, (2) people differ in motivations and expectancies, and these differences do not fully account for differences in response, (3) individual differences in response to suggestion are extreme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physiological data of changes associated with hypnotic responding are not considered to have any bearing on the ASC hypotheses and are actually self evident as all subjective experiences or psychological manifestations are assumed to have physiological substrates (Kirsch and Lynn, 1995;Kirsch, 1999a;Wagstaff, 2000).…”
Section: The Central Issues That Divide the Theoretical Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physiological data of changes associated with hypnotic responding are not considered to have any bearing on the ASC hypotheses and are actually self evident as all subjective experiences or psychological manifestations are assumed to have physiological substrates (Kirsch and Lynn, 1995;Kirsch, 1999a;Wagstaff, 2000).…”
Section: The Central Issues That Divide the Theoretical Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%