2009
DOI: 10.1080/10641190802620198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Settlement Prediction in a Vertical Drainage-Installed Soft Clay Deposit Using the Genetic Algorithm (GA) Back-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the creep and destructuration-related parameters have also been identified by Ye et al (2016). A stochastic optimization technique generic algorithm (GA) has also been widely used to identify parameters in various constitutive models (Pal et al, 1996;Mašín et al, 2006), pile group optimization (Chan et al, 2009), determination of soil hydraulic properties (Mahbod & Zand-Parsa, 2010), settlement prediction of soft clays (Park et al, 2009), slope stability analysis (Zolfaghari et al, 2005;Goh, 1999). Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is another populationbased stochastic optimization algorithm that has been a valuable tool employed in inverse problems in geotechnical engineering.…”
Section: Inverse Analysis Methods In Geotechnical Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the creep and destructuration-related parameters have also been identified by Ye et al (2016). A stochastic optimization technique generic algorithm (GA) has also been widely used to identify parameters in various constitutive models (Pal et al, 1996;Mašín et al, 2006), pile group optimization (Chan et al, 2009), determination of soil hydraulic properties (Mahbod & Zand-Parsa, 2010), settlement prediction of soft clays (Park et al, 2009), slope stability analysis (Zolfaghari et al, 2005;Goh, 1999). Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is another populationbased stochastic optimization algorithm that has been a valuable tool employed in inverse problems in geotechnical engineering.…”
Section: Inverse Analysis Methods In Geotechnical Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where f (•) represents the fitness function that correspond to Eq. (14). By using the DE, the GP hyper-parameters can be obtained quickly, as well as the training samples with the parameters, so the GP respond surface mapping with the input consisted of the jointed parameters, and the output consisted of displacement and stress values can be constructed.…”
Section: The Gp Respond Surface Optimized By Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason is that the complex constitutive model and 3D numerical calculation are time-consuming, which makes the parameters identification more difficult [12,13]. In order to improve the computing speed, more and more evolutionary intelligent optimization algorithms, including the genetic algorithm (GA) [14], evolution strategy algorithm (ESA) [15], and particle swarm optimization (PSO) [16,17], have been combined with numerical algorithms for back analysis. Furthermore, the nonlinear respond surface methodology (RSM) has been employed to map the nonlinear relation between the mechanical parameters and displacement of surrounding rock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In geotechnical engineering, the GAs have been widely used to solve various problems such as parameter identification of constitutive models, 12,[18][19][20][21][22][23]45 prediction of soil hydraulic parameters, [46][47][48] identification of critical slip surfaces in slope stability analysis, [49][50][51][52][53] prediction of vertical settlement, 54 optimization of pile group design, 34,55 reliability analysis, 56 and prediction of soil-water characteristic curves for unsaturated soils. 57…”
Section: Genetic Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%