2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.07.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setup and evaluation of a SWAN wind wave model for the Sea of Marmara

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the physical coherence showed by the code, a more detailed analysis indicates that SWAN code most of the time overestimated the significant heights of the waves (Figures 5 and 6), as well as in the work of Vieira et al (2020). Further results from the literature show that SWAN applications can either underestimate or overestimate wave amplitude within the same data series when compared to measured data (Moeini & Etemad-Shahidi, 2009;van der Westhuysen, 2010;Gorrell et al, 2011;Pallares et al, 2014;Mao et al, 2016;Lemke et al, 2017;Kutupoğlu et al, 2018;Hoque et al, 2020) obtained through different media or equipment -buoys, pressure sensors, capacitance probes, nonintrusive sensors, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Despite the physical coherence showed by the code, a more detailed analysis indicates that SWAN code most of the time overestimated the significant heights of the waves (Figures 5 and 6), as well as in the work of Vieira et al (2020). Further results from the literature show that SWAN applications can either underestimate or overestimate wave amplitude within the same data series when compared to measured data (Moeini & Etemad-Shahidi, 2009;van der Westhuysen, 2010;Gorrell et al, 2011;Pallares et al, 2014;Mao et al, 2016;Lemke et al, 2017;Kutupoğlu et al, 2018;Hoque et al, 2020) obtained through different media or equipment -buoys, pressure sensors, capacitance probes, nonintrusive sensors, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…4, c and in Table 2 show that the scattering index between the calculated and measured wave heights for variant V3 is 11 % less than for variant V2, and 20 % less than the scattering index obtained for variant V1. In the Sevastopol region, the scattering index 0.29, corresponds to variant V3, and in some cases does it better than in the other works [16,17,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Results Of the Model Tuningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The wind data are input to the SWAN model as a regular grid with a spatial resolution of 20 km and a temporal resolution of 1 h. At the open boundaries, the model is forced by wave parameter values from the ERA-5 dataset, interpolated along the boundary points at 1 h resolution. The ERA-5 data (and its predecessor ERA-Interim) are commonly used as boundary inputs to a number of coastal wave models (see, e.g., [37][38][39]) (a full description of the boundary input wave data from ERA-5 is given at [40] ). SWAN provides wave parameters at each time step to the D-Flow FM flow model and receives flow data in return.…”
Section: Guernseymentioning
confidence: 99%