1996
DOI: 10.1016/0196-9781(96)00028-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Several roles of CCKA and CCKB receptor subtypes in CCK-8-induced and LiCl-induced taste aversion conditioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CTA effects after administration of CCK 8 are completely blocked by the CCK 1 ‐receptor antagonist MK‐329 and only partially blocked by the CCK 2 ‐receptor antagonist L‐365.260 ( Mosher et al ., 1996 ). The partial antagonistic effect of L‐365.260 was ascribed to an anxiolytic effect of the antagonist, as it is also able to partially antagonize LiCl‐induced CTA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CTA effects after administration of CCK 8 are completely blocked by the CCK 1 ‐receptor antagonist MK‐329 and only partially blocked by the CCK 2 ‐receptor antagonist L‐365.260 ( Mosher et al ., 1996 ). The partial antagonistic effect of L‐365.260 was ascribed to an anxiolytic effect of the antagonist, as it is also able to partially antagonize LiCl‐induced CTA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of CCK receptor blockade on acquisition of this preference was assessed in Experiment 3. Since gastric distension may activate CCK release and ensuing stimulation ofCCK A receptors, and since stimulation of these receptors has aversive consequences (Mosher, Birkemo, Johnson, & Ervin, 1998;Mosher, Johnson, Birkemo, & Ervin, 1996), we hypothesized that a CCK A antagonist would enhance place preference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%