1998
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb138989.x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severe cervical spinal cord injuries related to rugby union and league football in New South Wales, 1984‐1996

Abstract: ObjectiveTo determine the frequency and circumstances of serious cervical cord injuries associated with rugby union and league football in New South Wales. DesignRetrospective review of patients with rugby football‐related cervical spinal cord injuries. SettingThe two central spinal units in NSW, from January 1984 to July 1996. Outcome measuresAdmission to spinal units; injury resulting in permanent tetraplegia. ResultsDuring the review period, 115 rugby football players (56 union and 59 league) were admitted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the current consensus statement for rugby injury data collection recognises the importance of calculating incidences for comparability across playing nations,20 it still does not include ‘near miss’ outcomes in the definition of catastrophic injury. The small difference between non-permanent and permanent outcomes, and therefore the epidemiological importance of including these outcomes, has been stated by various authors in the past3 24 and was clearly illustrated in a recent UK study of spinal injuries in junior players 25…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…While the current consensus statement for rugby injury data collection recognises the importance of calculating incidences for comparability across playing nations,20 it still does not include ‘near miss’ outcomes in the definition of catastrophic injury. The small difference between non-permanent and permanent outcomes, and therefore the epidemiological importance of including these outcomes, has been stated by various authors in the past3 24 and was clearly illustrated in a recent UK study of spinal injuries in junior players 25…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The last of these injuries is the only one of limited significance, while the remaining 11 represent potentially catastrophic injuries or ‘near misses’ (figure 2). Previous authors have recognised the significance of near misses11 suggesting they can provide ‘collateral evidence of trends in frequency of serious injury’ 4. Williams and McKibbin12 proposed that a serious neck injury is one showing sufficient instability to damage the spinal cord or requires surgical stabilisation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review from South Africa15 has observed that players aged 17 years had the highest number of spinal cord injuries, although other reviews have suggested that the peak age is slightly older at 22–25 years 8 11 16…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] The most frequently injured vertebrae are C4 to C6. 1 7 Approximately half of all cervical spine injuries in rugby result in tetraplegia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%