Severely Mentally Ill Client Acceptance of Automated Assessments in Mental Health

Hile, Matthew G.; Vieweg, Bruce W.

doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2352-8_25

Cited by 7 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The three resulting factors Completeness and satisfaction, Ease ofuse and enjoyment, and Negative attitudes account for 57.6% ofthe variance in the CSAS-M (see Table 1). The factor structure is quite consistent with the earlier factor analysis ofthe C/MIS data (Hile & Vieweg, 1996), which identified the same first three factors and an additional single-item fourth factor, Truthfulness. For ISAP clients, "truthfulness" (Item 6) moved to the Completeness and satisfaction factor.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 86%

“…Its development (Hile & Hedlund, 1989) and current status (Hile & Vieweg, 1996) have been described elsewhere. The clients who complete C/MIS automated assessments are seeking publicly funded mental health services.…”

Section: Description Of Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Clients typicalIy take between 45 and 90 min to complete these assessments. The results from these assessments are described fulIy elsewhere (Hile & Vieweg, 1996). In these analyses only selected comparisons are made between the two client groups.…”

Section: Description Of Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The specific items are listed in Table 1. This scale is an adaptation 2 of the sat-RILE AND ADKINS isfaction measure designed for the C/MIS system (CSAS; Hile & Vieweg, 1996). In both ISAP and C/MIS, clients complete this automated questionnaire after they have completed all of the other automated client-completed assessments.…”

Section: Description Of Measurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, these individuals are compared with a sample ofindividuals seeking mental health services who also completed a set of automated assessments (Hile & Vieweg, 1996).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Do substance abuse and mental health clients prefer automated assessments?

Hile

Adkins

1997

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 86%

Section: Description Of Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Description Of Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Description Of Measurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, these individuals are compared with a sample ofindividuals seeking mental health services who also completed a set of automated assessments (Hile & Vieweg, 1996).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Do substance abuse and mental health clients prefer automated assessments?

Hile

Adkins

1997

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Computer-administered interviews and rating scales.

Garb¹

2007

Psychological Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To evaluate the value of computer-administered interviews and rating scales, the following topics are reviewed in the present article: (a) strengths and weaknesses of structured and unstructured assessment instruments, (b) advantages and disadvantages of computer administration, and (c) the validity and utility of computer-administered interviews and rating scales. Computer-administered evaluations are more comprehensive and reliable and less biased than evaluations routinely conducted in clinical practice. Also, the use of continuous monitoring systems, which increasingly entail the use of computer administration, has been related to improved treatment outcome. However, the use of computer-administered interviews and rating scales will sometimes lead to false positive diagnoses, and for this reason, it is recommended that computer assessment be combined with clinical judgment.

show abstract