2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10691-006-9029-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex and the civil partnership act: the future of (non) conjugality?

Abstract: This article considers the transgressive and transformative possibilities in the sexual silences of the U.K.'s Civil Partnership Act 2004. The absence of a consummation requirement and adultery as a specific ground of dissolution do open up some possibilities but are not unproblematic. These issues are explored in the context of the England and Wales Law Commission's apparent 'return' to a conjugal model in its forthcoming consultation on cohabitation. It is concluded that though the Act may open up possibilit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is therefore a need to cast a critical eye over the potential differential economic and social impacts of samesex marriage on lesbians, especially in the Spanish context, where so much emphasis is put on the family as a source of reciprocal care and economic support that underlines not only the welfare system but the whole organisation of the State. Similar research is taking place in Canada through the work of Susan Boyd and Claire Young (2003;, and in the UK through the work of Rosemary Auchmuty (2004), Nicola Barker (2006), Davina Cooper (2001) and Carl Stychin (2006), among others. These authors have pointed out the need for a deeper, intersectional analysis of the differential effects of marriage on disenfranchised individuals.…”
Section: Lesbian (In)visibilitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There is therefore a need to cast a critical eye over the potential differential economic and social impacts of samesex marriage on lesbians, especially in the Spanish context, where so much emphasis is put on the family as a source of reciprocal care and economic support that underlines not only the welfare system but the whole organisation of the State. Similar research is taking place in Canada through the work of Susan Boyd and Claire Young (2003;, and in the UK through the work of Rosemary Auchmuty (2004), Nicola Barker (2006), Davina Cooper (2001) and Carl Stychin (2006), among others. These authors have pointed out the need for a deeper, intersectional analysis of the differential effects of marriage on disenfranchised individuals.…”
Section: Lesbian (In)visibilitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For instance, according to some, this new 'othering' might include women and men who form intimate associations and family relationships that are not based on traditional gender and familial norms . As well as 'gay marriage' and civil partnerships, some have suggested that access to parenting rights may divide lesbians and gay men as 'respectable' normative LGBT citizens (Barker 2006). Another issue concerns the uneven benefits of sexual citizenship.…”
Section: The Utility Of the Concept Of Citizenship For Gender And Sexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relata of annulment may change such that we (and the law) no longer care whether newlyweds are sexually differentiated people, or whether they consummate their vows or not (Barker 2006). As discussed above, the latter is true in Australia.…”
Section: Post-apocalyptic Conjugality? Some Tentative Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%