2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex difference in incidence of gastric cancer: an international comparative study based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017

Abstract: ObjectivesTo investigate sex difference in global gastric cancer incidence by year, age and socioeconomical status.DesignAn international comparative study.SettingWe obtained the global and national sex-specific incidence of gastric caner by year and age from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The human development index (HDI) in 2017 as an indicator of national socioeconomical status was extracted from the Human Development Report.Main outcome measuresSex-specific incidence of gastric cancer was compare… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

10
49
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(37 reference statements)
10
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirdly, the improvement of socioeconomic status [7,8,20,24] and the advancement of medical technology and treatment [3] might contribute to a decline in the GC burden and also cause differences in the changing trends of GC burden in different regions and countries. Moreover, corresponds to other research reports [2,9,12], the GC burden in males was much higher than that in females, and this difference increased with age and reached a peak in the 50-69 age group. Males first have more opportunities to be exposed to occupational and environmental risk factors [5,22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thirdly, the improvement of socioeconomic status [7,8,20,24] and the advancement of medical technology and treatment [3] might contribute to a decline in the GC burden and also cause differences in the changing trends of GC burden in different regions and countries. Moreover, corresponds to other research reports [2,9,12], the GC burden in males was much higher than that in females, and this difference increased with age and reached a peak in the 50-69 age group. Males first have more opportunities to be exposed to occupational and environmental risk factors [5,22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Many studies have evaluated the GC burden at the global, regional, and national levels [2,7,9,12], however, the GC burden of different sexes and age-specific groups remains unknown. In this study, based on the latest database of the Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) study (2019), we comprehensively evaluated the global changing trends of GC incidence and mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify statins’ pleiotropic effects, previous studies have used genetically mimicked statins to assess statins’ metabolomic profile [ 13 ], compared it with that of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors [ 14 ], and compared statin’s lipoprotein signature with that of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors [ 15 ]. However, none of these studies has been comprehensive across the phenotype or sex-specific, when differences by sex are evident for the incidence of CVD [ 16 ] and some cancers [ 17 , 18 ], highlighting the possibility of sex-specific pathways and sex-specific impacts. To fill this gap, we conducted a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS), a summary statistics-based [ 19 ] genotype-to-phenotype approach [ 20 , 21 ], to assess systematically the sex-specific associations of genetically mimicking statins with a wide range of conditions and related phenotypes, using the largest available genome-wide association studies (GWAS), with validation where possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender was also an important factor affecting the development of cancers ( Li et al, 2019 ; Lou et al, 2020 ). When stratified by gender, our data shows that individuals with the C7 rs1061429 AA genotype have an increased risk of gastric cancer in both men and women, but the risk in women is significantly higher than that in men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%