2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Differences in Case Fatality Rate of COVID-19: Insights From a Multinational Registry

Abstract: Objectives: To confirm whether a relationship exists between male sex and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality and whether this relationship is age dependent. Patients and Methods: We queried the COVID-19 Research Network, a multinational database using the TriNetX network, to identify patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection. The main end point of the study was all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 14,712 patients were included, of whom 6387 (43%) were men. Men were older (mean age, 55.0AE17.7 y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
128
1
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
15
128
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings determined that males between 90-99 years was the most affected age group (CFR = 39.35%). In accordance with the current evidence, 3 , 4 we corroborated older adults and men were the most affected groups.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our findings determined that males between 90-99 years was the most affected age group (CFR = 39.35%). In accordance with the current evidence, 3 , 4 we corroborated older adults and men were the most affected groups.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The median 17 The majority of recent studies have focused on the crude mortality or casefatality rates of COVID-19. [18][19][20][21] The latter is a proportion of the cumulative reported number of deaths by the cumulative number of reported cases and can be misleading, as there is often a lag in the manifestation of symptoms, testing for disease, and reporting of the number of cases, meaning that the true case-fatality rate is often underestimated, as demonstrated with previous epidemics. 22,23 ASMRs take into account differences in the age structure of a population and allow a more direct comparison of underlying conditions, especially when these vary by age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-sided p -value <0.05 was considered to be significant. We reported two models for the analyses of the mortality and composite endpoints: model 1: All of the significant variables in the univariate analysis were included as covariates, plus gender—a known risk factor for lethality [ 13 ]; model 2: Covariates were chosen by the backward selection method. A sensitivity analysis was performed with the aim of evaluating the effect of cortisone on the two outcomes, comparing the survival curves stratified by cortisone use and evaluating the inclusion of cortisone use in the multivariable models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%