2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.12.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in distribution, management and outcomes of combined ischemic-bleeding risk following acute coronary syndrome

Abstract: Background: Risk factors of bleeding and recurrent ischemic events after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) often overlap. Whether the distribution and management of these complications vary by sex remains unknown.Methods: ACS hospitalizations in the United Kingdom between 2010 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed, stratified by sex and bleeding-ischaemic risk combination (using CRUSADE and GRACE scores). Regression analyses were performed to examine the association between risk-groups and receipt of percutaneous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ACS patients often present with risk factors for both ischemia and bleeding event, and certain risk factors can potentially trigger both of these adverse event types. Mohamed et al (10) found that one in three ACS patients exhibited high-risk factors for both bleeding and ischemic events while also observing higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; cardiac death and reinfarction) and all-cause bleeding events as compared to non-bi-risk patients, in line with the present results. However, in the current study cohort, 58.8% of patients were classified as bi-risk individuals, since prior studies have included bi-risk patients among the overall ACS patient population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…ACS patients often present with risk factors for both ischemia and bleeding event, and certain risk factors can potentially trigger both of these adverse event types. Mohamed et al (10) found that one in three ACS patients exhibited high-risk factors for both bleeding and ischemic events while also observing higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; cardiac death and reinfarction) and all-cause bleeding events as compared to non-bi-risk patients, in line with the present results. However, in the current study cohort, 58.8% of patients were classified as bi-risk individuals, since prior studies have included bi-risk patients among the overall ACS patient population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As demonstrated in a retrospective cohort study of patients with AMI, fewer women had undergone revascularization of any type, even after matching for age and type of AMI with men ( 18 ). Likewise, in patients with ACS and concomitant high bleeding risk and high ischemic risk, guideline-recommended therapy (including revascularization and DAPT) was given less often to women than men with similar risk profiles [ 19 ]. In another report on patients with AMI, a higher proportion of men than women received mechanical circulatory support, despite a higher percentage of women presenting with cardiogenic shock [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is crucial to assess the factors associated with bleeding risk. As advanced age (21) and female sex (22) are associated with increased bleeding risk, primary physicians of these patients might prefer clopidogrel, which could explain the significant differences in age and male sex between the prasugrel/ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups. However, there was no correlation between hemoglobin fall ≥3 g/dL and age, sex, or antiplatelet agent used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%