2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in effective fronto-limbic connectivity during negative emotion processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(62 reference statements)
2
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, to allow an evaluation of the training independent of menstrual-cycle or gender effects on ER and associated neural activity [46, 47, 49], our proof-of-concept study focused on male participants. The question of whether training success generalizes to female subjects and potential sex differences therefore remains to be addressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, to allow an evaluation of the training independent of menstrual-cycle or gender effects on ER and associated neural activity [46, 47, 49], our proof-of-concept study focused on male participants. The question of whether training success generalizes to female subjects and potential sex differences therefore remains to be addressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the main aim was to evaluate the feasibility and functional relevance of connectivity-informed rt-fMRI NFT potential confounding effects of menstrual cycle-related variation in ER [46], as well as sex differences in ER capacity [47], ER strategies [48] and associated connectivity in the target pathway [49] were controlled for by focusing on a male sample. Detailed eligibility criteria and sample characteristics are provided in the online supplementary materials (for all online suppl.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal studies demonstrated sex differences (greater in females than males) in a number of domains, including greater immobility in tasks associated with mood-related phenotypic behavior 29 , increased ACTH, corticosterone, and glucocorticoid receptor binding 30,31 , and increased corticosterone sensitivity 32 . A recent neuroimaging study in humans reported sex differences in fronto-limbic connectivity with women having more affective and men more evaluative responses to negative affective stimuli 33 . In the study reported here, we hypothesized that hyperactivity in subcortical arousal regions and hypoactivity in cortical regions and hippocampus would be associated with severity of dysphoric mood, and that these deficits in ability to regulate neural response to negative affective stimuli will be greater among women than men.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to account for modulation in Granger effective connectivity by the task, we used an approach similar to the psychophysiological interaction (PPI) technique (40), whereby we included in the regression model the values of the BOLD signal time series originating from a seed cluster multiplied with the weights of the regressor corresponding to the task (i.e., the PPI term). This approach allowed to evaluate the variations in GC effective connectivity between pairs of ROIs during experimental conditions (i.e., Tobacco, Negative, and Neutral) relative to one another or to rest periods (26, 41). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%