2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10592-008-9565-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex identification of wolf (Canis lupus) using non-invasive samples

Abstract: We have developed new specific primers for sex determination from forensic samples of wolves (Canis lupus), such as hair, saliva, faecal, tooth and urine samples. In order to improve molecular sexing, we performed a multiplex semi-nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and several replicated amplifications per sample to avoid errors in low quantity DNA samples, such as allelic dropout and false alleles. The sex of individuals is automatically determined by capillary electrophoresis with a fluorescently labelle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…faeces, hair, etc.) have now been successfully applied to many studies of endangered mammals, such as population structure in brown bears (Perez et al 2009), sex determination in wolves (Sastre et al 2009), estimation of effective population sizes in giant pandas (Zhan et al 2006) and dietary habits in carnivores (Farrell et al 2000). This approach can be particularly useful in rare, endangered and secretive species like bongo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…faeces, hair, etc.) have now been successfully applied to many studies of endangered mammals, such as population structure in brown bears (Perez et al 2009), sex determination in wolves (Sastre et al 2009), estimation of effective population sizes in giant pandas (Zhan et al 2006) and dietary habits in carnivores (Farrell et al 2000). This approach can be particularly useful in rare, endangered and secretive species like bongo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA from tooth samples was amplified in a PCR mixture containing 30-40 ng of DNA, PCR buffer (19), 2.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.4 lM of each primer and 1 U AmpliTaq Gold DNA Polymerase (Applied Biosystems). In order to avoid typing errors in tooth DNA sampleswith DNA of low quality and quantity-each sample was amplified four times (Sastre et al 2009). DNA from blood samples was amplified in two multiplex PCR reactions with three (MS34A, MS41A and 990) and two markers (MS34B, MS41B).…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, detection and identification of species is difficult for rare and threatened taxa, mainly due to their low densities, nocturnal and elusive behaviour, and to the logistical and ethical difficulties involved in their capture and handling during traditional capture-markrecapture approaches. This has prompted the development of non-invasive tools applied to samples such as faeces, hair, feathers, urine, saliva, scent marks, sloughed skin and animal products illegally trafficked (e.g., Taberlet et al 1999;Dalèn et al 2004, Arrendal et al 2007Hogan et al 2008;Jones et al 2008;Sundqvist et al 2008;Sastre et al 2009). However, non-invasive samples seldom allow species identification based on morphology alone (Davison et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%