2006
DOI: 10.1525/srsp.2006.3.2.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex, lies, and law: Moral turpitude as an enforcer of gender and sexuality norms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Myths about rape, prostitution, and child sexual abuse imply that crimes involving sexuality inherently involve moral judgments (e.g., Bieneck & Krahé, 2011; Walsh, Eckhardt, & Russell, 2006). Historically, a rape victim’s character has been called into question as a relevant factor in her responsibility in precipitating her own victimization (e.g., Schuller & Hastings, 2002), and participation in prostitution has been equated with guilt regardless of external influencing factors (Brown, 2004; Farley, 2003; Sullivan, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myths about rape, prostitution, and child sexual abuse imply that crimes involving sexuality inherently involve moral judgments (e.g., Bieneck & Krahé, 2011; Walsh, Eckhardt, & Russell, 2006). Historically, a rape victim’s character has been called into question as a relevant factor in her responsibility in precipitating her own victimization (e.g., Schuller & Hastings, 2002), and participation in prostitution has been equated with guilt regardless of external influencing factors (Brown, 2004; Farley, 2003; Sullivan, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%