2012
DOI: 10.2478/v10146-012-0006-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex ratio and genetic diversity in the dioecious Pistacia atlantica (Anacardiaceae)

Abstract: The levels of genetic variation in dioecious plant species have been reported to differ between male and female populations. This has been attributed to different factors including distribution patterns of individuals, sex ratio and also stochastic events. We measured the levels of genetic diversity in male and female populations of dioecious Pistacia atlantica (pistachio, Anacardiaceae) separately for each region and genders in two eco-geographically different regions over 350 km apart and of different popula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of the genetic polymorphism between male genotype population and female genotype population by SCoT and CBDP markers revealed that the male genotype populations in both cases yielded higher polymorphism and PIC, MI, Rp values than the female populations. This is in agreement with the reports on Pistacia atlantica ( Nosrati et al, 2012 ) and S. chinensis ( Sharma et al, 2009 ). Nosrati et al (2012) concluded from their study that higher levels of genetic variation in male populations resulted due to the higher number of male plants and even distribution of males than females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison of the genetic polymorphism between male genotype population and female genotype population by SCoT and CBDP markers revealed that the male genotype populations in both cases yielded higher polymorphism and PIC, MI, Rp values than the female populations. This is in agreement with the reports on Pistacia atlantica ( Nosrati et al, 2012 ) and S. chinensis ( Sharma et al, 2009 ). Nosrati et al (2012) concluded from their study that higher levels of genetic variation in male populations resulted due to the higher number of male plants and even distribution of males than females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This is in agreement with the reports on Pistacia atlantica ( Nosrati et al, 2012 ) and S. chinensis ( Sharma et al, 2009 ). Nosrati et al (2012) concluded from their study that higher levels of genetic variation in male populations resulted due to the higher number of male plants and even distribution of males than females. Similar interpretation could be drawn for Jojoba because of its male biased population (5:1; male:female ratio) in nature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their analysis revealed minimal significant differences in the values of the tested parameters (H e , H o , A/L), which they suggested to be due to the different number of male and female individuals in the populations and the influence of genetic drift on allele frequencies in the populations. Additionally, Nosrati et al (2012) measured levels of genetic diversity for male and female individuals of the dioecious atlantic pistachio (Pistacia atlantica Defs.) using RAPD markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have shown that landscape fragmentation may lead to a biased sex ratio in dioecious plant populations [10,11]. Biased sex ratios may further influence the genetic diversity, but the consequences may be different for different species [12][13][14]. Vandepitte et al [15] observed that genotypic diversity decreased with more male-biased sex ratios in the dioecious forest perennial Mercurialis perennis L. Hilfiker et al [12] studied the small populations experiencing genetic drift and revealed an increased sex ratio bias toward females in the dioecious conifer Taxus baccata L. Thus, dioecious plants may differ greatly in their responses to landscape fragmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%