2016
DOI: 10.1111/bij.12871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-specific catch-up growth in the Texas field cricket,Gryllus texensis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies, however, are inconsistent as to whether predictions were met or not (Barreto et al 2003;Livingston et al 2014;Stillwell & Davidowitz 2010;Tawes & Kelly 2017), thus indicating that possible trade-offs between growth compensation, taxon-dependent lifehistory, and environmental conditions that determine the adaptive value of compensation require further research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies, however, are inconsistent as to whether predictions were met or not (Barreto et al 2003;Livingston et al 2014;Stillwell & Davidowitz 2010;Tawes & Kelly 2017), thus indicating that possible trade-offs between growth compensation, taxon-dependent lifehistory, and environmental conditions that determine the adaptive value of compensation require further research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As benefits and costs of developmental compensation may differ considerably between males and females, integrating pre-estimated divergent selection on body size may substantiate experimental work on such strategies. Plastic modifications of life-history traits have been related to experimental feeding regimes in a range of studies (Bauerfeind & Fischer 2005;Bonneaud et al 2016;Dahl et al 2012;Davidowitz et al 2003;Fernandez-Montraveta & Moya-Larano 2007;Kleinteich & Schneider 2011;Krause & Caspers 2016), but relatively few of these have addressed sex-specific differences regarding compensatory development (Arnold et al 2007;Chin et al 2013;Tawes & Kelly 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, predictions concerning such differences are based on (1) proposed sex-specific net benefits of growth compensation (i.e., the sex whose fitness depends stronger on large body size is expected to show a higher degree of growth compensation), (2) on the possibility to increase size after sexual maturation (i.e., determinate versus indeterminate growth; with determinate growth generating stronger selection pressure to compensate growth deficits), and (3) on potential long-term costs of compensatory development ( Livingston, Kahn & Jennions, 2014 ). Previous studies, however, are inconsistent as to whether predictions were met or not ( Barreto, Moreira & Carvalho, 2003 ; Livingston, Kahn & Jennions, 2014 ; Stillwell & Davidowitz, 2010 ; Tawes & Kelly, 2016 ), thus indicating that possible trade-offs between growth compensation, taxon-dependent life-history, and environmental conditions that determine the adaptive value of compensation require further research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As benefits and costs of developmental compensation may differ considerably between males and females, integrating pre-estimated divergent selection on body size may substantiate experimental work on such strategies. Plastic modifications of life-history traits have been related to experimental feeding regimes in a range of studies ( Bauerfeind & Fischer, 2005 ; Bonneaud et al, 2016 ; Dahl et al, 2012 ; Davidowitz, D’Amico & Nijhout, 2003 ; Fernandez-Montraveta & Moya-Larano, 2007 ; Kleinteich & Schneider, 2011 ; Krause & Caspers, 2016 ), but relatively few of these have addressed sex-specific differences regarding compensatory development ( Arnold et al, 2007 ; Chin et al, 2013 ; Tawes & Kelly, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following a physiologically costly event or a period of poor nutrition, juveniles may increase their growth rate (i.e., compensatory growth) or prolong development (i.e., catch‐up growth) to increase body size prior to maturity (Jobling, 2010 ; Metcalfe & Monaghan, 2001 ). For example, female field crickets deprived of food will prolong development time in order to maximize their adult body size (Tawes & Kelly, 2017 ), an important determinant of lifetime fitness (Saleh et al, 2014 ). Should infection occur after sexual maturity, however, considerable strain is placed on gamete production upon upregulating the immune response (Schwenke et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%