2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.12.01.470834
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-specific Stress and Behavioural Responses to Human Experimenters in Rats

Abstract: The sex of the experimenter may cause stress in animal models and be a major confounding factor in preclinical research. We studied the effects of the sex of the experimenter on female and male rat anxiety behaviours using thigmotaxis in the open field test, anxiety-induced changes in brain and back temperature using infra-red thermography, and alterations in plasma concentrations of stress hormones, corticosterone and oxytocin. Female rats displayed consistently exacerbated anxiety-related behaviours along wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential discrepancies between the present results and earlier investigations that have found no sex differences in the EAE mouse model might derive from age, the EAE induction regimen, the severity of the disease course, as well as procedural stress induced by animal handling, testing or the experimenter's sex. Indeed, the opposite-gender dynamics that have been recently reviewed in humans ( Chapman et al, 2018 ) may be reproduced in preclinical studies ( Faraji et al, 2021 ; Sorge et al, 2014 ) and are typically linked to psychophysiological distress. Accordingly, stress-induced hyperthermia and infection-induced fever are two distinct physiological processes that need to be differentiated by comprehensive biobehavioral testing ( Harden et al, 2015 ; Spencer et al, 2005 ; Vinkers et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Potential discrepancies between the present results and earlier investigations that have found no sex differences in the EAE mouse model might derive from age, the EAE induction regimen, the severity of the disease course, as well as procedural stress induced by animal handling, testing or the experimenter's sex. Indeed, the opposite-gender dynamics that have been recently reviewed in humans ( Chapman et al, 2018 ) may be reproduced in preclinical studies ( Faraji et al, 2021 ; Sorge et al, 2014 ) and are typically linked to psychophysiological distress. Accordingly, stress-induced hyperthermia and infection-induced fever are two distinct physiological processes that need to be differentiated by comprehensive biobehavioral testing ( Harden et al, 2015 ; Spencer et al, 2005 ; Vinkers et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study was to compare female and male C57BL/6 mice for susceptibility to EAE and their clinical progression using infrared (IR) thermography. IR thermography provides a non-invasive assessment of surface thermal changes in response to inflammation ( Całkosiński et al, 2015 ) and stress ( Faraji et al, 2021 ; Faraji and Metz, 2020 ; Tattersall, 2016 ) and accurately reflects variations in core temperature ( Mei et al, 2018 ). Although the average core temperature of mice under standard housing conditions is approximately between 36.5 °C and 37.5 °C, the surface temperature in mice is normally lower than the core temperature (32–36 °C) depending on the measuring tool and procedure ( Gordon, 2017 ; Mei et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confounding effects of the experimenter’s sex may play a critical role in causing sex-biased differences in rodent models. Indeed, the opposite-gender dynamics that have been recently reviewed in humans (Chapman, Benedict, & Schiöth, 2018) may be reproduced in preclinical studies (Faraji et al, 2021; Sorge et al, 2014) and are typically linked to psychophysiological distress. Accordingly, stress-induced hyperthermia and infection-induced fever are two distinct physiological processes that need to be differentiated by comprehensive biobehavioural testing (Harden, Kent, Pittman, & Roth, 2015; Spencer, Heida, & Pittman, 2005; Vinkers et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study was to compare female and male C57BL/6 mice for susceptibility to EAE and their clinical progression using infrared (IR) thermography. IR thermography provides a non-invasive assessment of surface thermal changes in response to inflammation (Całkosiński et al, 2015) and stress (Faraji et al, 2021; Faraji & Metz, 2020; Tattersall, 2016) and accurately reflects variations in core temperature (Mei et al, 2018). Indeed, the peripheral autonomic nervous system that regulates perspiration and surface blood perfusion, determines heat patterns and gradients during aversive experiences and physiological challenges (Ioannou, Gallese, & Merla, 2014; Redaelli et al, 2019; Vinkers et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioural training and testing were performed during the light phase at the same time each day. Male experimenters have been shown to produce increased stress responses in rodents (Sorge et al, 2014;Faraji et al, 2022). Therefore, all experiments were undertaken by the same female experimenter.…”
Section: Experimental Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%