“…Although since the 1990s, TWP has gradually become the focus of many international conventions, declarations, and policy documents (see Bell, 2001;Lazaridis, 2001;Rijken, 2003;Van Impe, 2000), evidence suggests that paradoxically, the willingness of states in general and particularly legal systems to take efficient actions to suppress TWP and prosecute traffickers and pimps is often lax, sporadic, or even nonexistent (e.g., Caldwell et al, 1999;Lebenkron & Dahan, 2003;Melrose & Barrett, 2006;Raymond et al, 2002;Rijken, 2003;Schauer & Wheaton, 2006). Interestingly, the main explanation found in the literature for this weak social reaction may be defined as attitudinal: Governments and legal systems in receiving countries usually perceive, and consequently respond to, TWP not as a serious criminal problem causing female victimization but rather as a much less severe problem of illegal migration, an approach that redefines these victimized women as criminals (e.g., Caldwell et al, 1999;Dinan, 2002;Raymond et al, 2002;Schauer & Wheaton, 2006;Tavcer, 2006).…”